| 查看: 1680 | 回复: 12 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
solskjaer300新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
100金币求助一个审稿人给的意见已有7人参与
|
|
|
投的 IEEE，一个审稿人刚开始说的缺乏原创性，不建议在IEEE发表，但是后面又说对于IEEE是个有益的补充。。搞不明白审稿人的态度，然后像这种缺乏原创性该如何回复呢？多谢大牛给意见！我怀疑是他中间给的意见是让我创新的，但是他的意见只是指出了我文章的一个概念性偏差。。所以真不知道这个审稿人是啥意思？第二个审稿人意见还好，最后编辑给的大修。 This paper is a useful contribution to the literature because it combines the analytics for the case of anisotropic scatter (following Rino) and the solution of the forth-order moment equation, in the strong scatter approximation. However, it is not original and should not be published in the IEEE Transactions of Antennas and Propagation. The paper is technically clear and well organized, but needs an English-speaking editor to correct the many language usage problems. Also there are numerous typos in the section of Reference, including Refs 19, 25, 33. The section on decorrelation distance (the paper calls this quantity “coherent length”) after two-way propagation is a bit confusing, as follows. For one-way propagation, let us transmit a wave upwards from a point source through a distance z to a plane. Let this be a two-dimensional example, so that the received field is a function only of x and the propagation distance z. Then we can consider the decorrelation function between the field at two points x1 and x2 in the plane z. The value of the distance x1-x2 where the decorrelation falls off to 1/e is the decorrelation distance. Now for the case of two-way propagation, we transmit again a wave upwards from a point source a distance z to a plane. Call this plane the reflecting plane. Next the wave travels downwards back to the transmitter plane where it can be measured. In this case, the decorrelation distance depends on the details of the reflection point(s) after the first (upwards) transmission. If the plane is perfectly reflecting, one would measure a certain decorrelation distance. If there were only a single point scatterer at the reflecting plane, then the decorrelation distance would be identical to that measured for one-way propagation in the downwards direction from the reflecting plane back to the plane where the transmitter is located. It seems that this is the only consistent definition of the decorrelation distance that is useful to the case of two-way propagation. Otherwise, the decorrelation distance depends on the redflecting plane, which can’t be correct. This issue should be addressed in any revisions of this paper. The paper would be a useful addition to the Antennas and Propagation Journal. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有14人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有4人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
读博
已经有3人回复
-
小论文投稿
已经有3人回复
-
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有9人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有8人回复
-
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
-
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有5人回复
gxylwrzhu
金虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 132 (高中生)
- 金币: 18176.3
- 红花: 20
- 帖子: 13793
- 在线: 177.6小时
- 虫号: 192430
- 注册: 2006-02-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机合成
13楼2014-01-21 17:10:17
babero
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 612 (博士)
- 金币: 37578.5
- 散金: 59
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 13845
- 在线: 2051.5小时
- 虫号: 458624
- 注册: 2007-11-13
- 专业: 自然地理学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ...
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
solskjaer300: 金币+100, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-01-23 08:34:36
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
solskjaer300: 金币+100, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-01-23 08:34:36
|
此审稿人整体的意见是此论文不是原创性的文章，不适合发表。具体提出下面的问题。但好的是编辑给出了大修的意见，说明编辑还是很认可这篇文章。 建议：逐一详细耐心回答此审稿人下面罗列的问题。最重要的是，在response to reviewer里详细说明此论文的意义及原创性。 好好改，接受应该没问题！ |
2楼2014-01-20 10:52:31
syzhndx
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 11916.5
- 散金: 1621
- 红花: 21
- 帖子: 2851
- 在线: 696.4小时
- 虫号: 1380495
- 注册: 2011-08-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学
3楼2014-01-20 11:05:33
4楼2014-01-20 11:06:40