24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2274  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

付小泡

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] analytical chemistry投稿已有1人参与

10月底投的稿,11月中旬给的回审意见。两个审稿人,一个建议直接发表,一个建议大修,主要的问题是觉得数据不足。

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in the American Chemical Society journal Analytical Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I do not believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Analytical Chemistry.

However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers' comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns.

I am sorry to have to convey this negative decision to you. Nevertheless, we appreciate your choice of Analytical Chemistry as a possible forum for the presentation of your work.

With sincere regards,

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Publish either as is or subject to minor revisions as indicated.

Additional Questions:

Significance: High

Originality: High

Broad Interest: Moderate

Technical Quality: High

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes

Are the references appropriate and correct?: Yes

Is the English adequate?: In Part

Is the quality of the figures sufficient?: Yes

Are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: Yes

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: May eventually be publishable, but requires major revisions as indicated.

Additional Questions:

Significance: High

Originality: High

Broad Interest: High

Technical Quality: High

Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes

Are the references appropriate and correct?: Yes

Is the English adequate?: Yes

Is the quality of the figures sufficient?: No

Are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: No

12月底修改投回,现在天天查邮件,着急万分,就指着它毕业、找工作了。

请教大家,这种情况接收的概率大不?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

戴钢盔的猪头

木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 付小泡 at 2014-01-14 10:42:44
已接受,谢谢。。。。...

原来楼主是做荧光谱的。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
6楼2014-01-15 01:13:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

longhai15

木虫 (小有名气)

★ ★
付小泡(book2005593代发): 金币+2, 楼主要求代发~ 2014-05-20 13:39:28
我和你的情况一样,你的稿子投过去是给的Resubmitted Manuscript还是什么?
2楼2014-01-14 08:46:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

戴钢盔的猪头

木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
付小泡(book2005593代发): 金币+3, 楼主要求代发~ 2014-05-20 13:39:38
给的是revision and resubmission还是unspired manuscript?感觉希望挺大的,两个审稿人的意见大多都是正面的。估计编辑拒你是因为怕你大修时间不够,索性给你充足时间让你修改。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2014-01-14 09:31:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

付小泡

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by longhai15 at 2014-01-14 08:46:14
我和你的情况一样,你的稿子投过去是给的Resubmitted Manuscript还是什么?

对的。。哈哈,今天早上收到信,已经接收。。。撒花。。。希望你也能早日发表。。。
4楼2014-01-14 10:41:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见