24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3922  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

foolishstar

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 收到初审意见了,大家说录用的可能性有多大? 已有5人参与

元旦收到文章的初审意见,有三个评审,有两个人很明确,支持发表,有一个也很明确,反对。原话如下:
1 Reviewer #1: The******** is a quite interesting topic, worth to be addressed in a systematic way.
The paper is well written, the experimental procedure is described (with some missing details as outlined below) and the experimental uncertainties are reported.
As far as the discussion and conclusions are concerned, in my opinion some points have to be clarified as suggested below.
In summary, I consider the paper worth to be published in Applied Thermal Engineering, provided the following amendments are carried out:
(下面是具体修改意见)
2 Reviewer #2: This paper reports ***********. The topic is very interesting. It is recommended that the manuscript be accepted, subject to however a major revision.
(下面是具体修改意见)
3 Reviewer #3: The paper is focused on*******. For this purpose the Authors consider that the proposed new index *****.
However, there are two weaknesses:
1. The innovative part is not clear; what new the article has to add in the ATE?
2. The Author's proposed system is very similar to an existing techno-commercial system.
In particular the Authors do not explain the originality of their approach and of their results with respect to the literature data.
In conclusion the paper is of low scientific quality and neither well presented and organized. Therefore the present manuscript is not suitable for publication in ATE.
(下面没有了)
我感觉第三个人没好好看,因为他说的我的论文的弱点不是我的主要的东西。但是我应该怎么跟他讲呢?
另外,大家说如果按照要求修改了,发表的几率多大?
谢谢
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

foolishstar

木虫 (小有名气)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2014-01-01 17:14:17
主编会做出自己的判断,关键是你的回答要有说服力...

对,要好好写
11楼2014-01-01 17:43:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

南海猪

金虫 (著名写手)

The only one

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
尽最大努力认真修改吧~总不能撤稿吧~楼主加油~早日accept~

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
出来混,不是你帮我就是我帮你~~~
2楼2014-01-01 16:41:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
foolishstar: 金币+30, ★★★★★最佳答案, nono这样说,心里就有底了! 2014-01-01 17:04:03
ATE这样的审稿意见,好好修改,录用基本没问题。
3楼2014-01-01 16:43:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vect

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
foolishstar: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助, 是啊,要谨慎。就是第三个人我不大知道该怎么回应,他的问题其实在文章中说过,我要么再跟他强调下?这样会不会对他不大尊重的感觉?他下次再审还是给拒了咋办啊? 2014-01-01 17:05:50
希望很大,前面两个都interesting,这个评价比较高了
第二个其实是大修,
第三个称论文表达方面不清楚,这些都可以改进,尤其是你要讲清楚你的方法的优点,及跟现有方法的比较
我觉得如果能认真回应的话,中的希望很大
4楼2014-01-01 16:45:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见