| 查看: 1510 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
gaoshuaiabcd新虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
大家说有没有必要和编辑argue呢 编辑建议转投RSC ADVANCES，并且转投后就接受 已有2人参与
|
||
|
投到POLYMER CHEMISTRY的。按照要求回答审稿人的问题，同时编辑另找了一个审稿人，一下是审稿人的意见 The responses the authors made are quite difficult to follow, let alone the typos. Although the authors did diligent work to respond to each of the reviewer's comments, the authors failed to provide healthy scientific discussions. In particular, while examining references of the FT-IR study on CN stretching, I found that Jang's paper contains exactly the same sentences the authors provided. >Authors’ response: But we can not assign the exact cyano interactions, may be due to (1) additional cyano stretching from different modes of interaction because cyanophenyl can engage in various interaction modes, including CN···HC interaction and CN···CN dimerization, or (2) C ≡ C stretching due to the more asymmetric environment when cyano groups are engaged in intermolecular interactions. > >Jang’s paper (Chem. Mater.): (1) additional cyano stretching from different modes of interaction because cyanophenyl can engage in various interaction modes, including CN···HC interaction and CN···CN dimerization, which have shown different shifts in frequency; (2) C≡C stretching due to the more asymmetric environment when cyano groups are engaged in intermolecular interactions. > > This practice should be avoided. In fact, HBFePc does not even have a C-C triple bond! > In addition, unlike the authors' response, the change of physical properties in the aggregate state should be referenced against those of the isolated molecule (oligomer in this case). Furthermore, alteration of the assembly mode by adding additives (surfactants in this case) is important to unveil the driving force of the assembly, and therefore it should receive more attention. The authors claimed that they edited English for the whole manuscript, however I still do not see the result of such effort. There are many run-on sentences and grammatical errors. One select example is “Futhermore, intermolecular cyano interactions also existence by comparison the changes of FT-IR spectra in the CN stretching.”. > For the reasons described above, I do not support publishing this paper 。 我觉得审稿人有些过分。 大家觉得有没有必要和编辑申诉那 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 有没有人发过文章到RSC Advances
已经有18人回复
- Green chem 被拒，编辑推荐RSC advances
已经有8人回复
- 投chem commun,回复建议我直接转入RSC Advances.
已经有7人回复
- 物理学报修改稿上传两个星期依旧没消息有没有必要催稿？
已经有16人回复
raymon7805
银虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 255 (大学生)
- 金币: 103.5
- 散金: 6202
- 红花: 33
- 帖子: 3329
- 在线: 989.5小时
- 虫号: 735766
- 注册: 2009-03-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
4楼2013-12-12 21:29:44
sally208
专家顾问 (著名写手)
-
专家经验: +19 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 443 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 0.809
- 金币: 7058.4
- 散金: 6125
- 红花: 123
- 帖子: 2290
- 在线: 412.2小时
- 虫号: 514807
- 注册: 2008-02-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光谱分析
- 管辖: 微米和纳米
2楼2013-12-12 21:00:54
绍敏郡主
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 289 (大学生)
- 金币: 1251.1
- 散金: 2196
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 1575
- 在线: 1866.7小时
- 虫号: 2611526
- 注册: 2013-08-22
- 专业: 原子和分子物理
3楼2013-12-12 21:12:40
30