24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1597  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yxyxy

新虫 (正式写手)


[求助] 审稿人的意思看不明白?

" I can see there is good work behind the approach, however, I insist, the orientation of the paper needs to represent the actual results reported in the experimental section. Clearly, for real data, fine surface shape is not accurately recovered. The shapes of nose and  mouth are extremely important indicators of a good reconstruction, just verify the discrepancy between the real and recovered noses of both subjects in Fig. 8. The authors do not discuss in depth the potential applications that (given the moderate results obtained with REAL data) their method would have, for example, avatar generation, 3D face tracking, head pose estimation. Again, I am not completely confident about the quality of the English language in the manuscript. It was hard for me to find the specific location of the correction to my comments in the paper, for example, the first major correction was explained as an answer in the response to authors, but it was not included in the paper (or at least I did not find it)."
特别是第一句话“the orientation of the paper needs to represent the actual results reported in the experimental section”,正如一个朋友翻译的“论文方向需要描述实验部分的真实结果”。但审稿人到底说的是什么意思?我始终整不明白? 什么叫“论文的方向需要表达实际结果”,结果部分就是讨论的论文算法啊?  为什么审稿人不说清楚些?到底他想说什么?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yxyxy

新虫 (正式写手)


引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by icefireice at 2013-11-27 04:41:20
这篇论文的方向应该提供实际结果,lz应该是没有在实际数据上做实验,只做了模拟之类的吧,可能...

实际数据和模拟数据都做了实验
8楼2013-11-28 11:34:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
“the orientation of the paper needs to represent the actual results reported in the experimental section”,
个人理解,应该是希望你的论文要更注重讨论实验结果。
2楼2013-11-26 19:34:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zb7451f

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
同意楼上的,就是让你强调讨论实验结果
什么都不是
3楼2013-11-26 19:39:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Odyssey1989

铁虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
回复里写得很明白,审稿人觉得

1.文章的英语还需要多加润色,2.楼主对审稿人得回复没答到点子上。。

建议楼主再把审稿人得问题好好看看,给审稿人的回复不需要十分精彩,但是一定要问什么答什么。千万不要拐弯抹角,模棱两可
Let's rock science!
4楼2013-11-26 20:01:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见