24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2280  |  回复: 25

xiangze

银虫 (著名写手)


[交流] 论文revise and resubit 修后回复意见了,结果还是这个状态。

论文revise and resubit 修后回复意见了,结果还是这个状态。
意见不多,主要是语法问题!这个是IEEE现在的审稿状态都只有这个状态吗?我这个修改了还会不会重新审,是直接给结论吗?

附上意见:
Editor's Comments:

Editor
Editor Comments for Author:
Please direct careful and detailed attention to English grammar.

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
Paper is OK but careful English editing is necessary. Caption of Figure 2 still inappropriate.

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
(There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.)

Reviewer: 3
Comments to the Author
This paper presents studies on the thickness of glaze icing on conductors in overhead transmission lines by conducting both extensive observations and mechanical model-based analysis. While the proposed mechanical model is nothing more than a fundamental statics of cables, the paper provides important field data as well as a new method for calculating the icing thickness, and therefore merits publication.

The manuscript has been revised to some extent, but additional amendments related with the following comments are still needed for the paper’s clarity and quality.

1) Extensive English editing is more carefully conducted.

2) In Fig. 3, ‘gamma’ must be replaced by the load per unit length q0, and the tension at the tower B should be also indicated, in order to make the figure more consistent with a figure used in the field of Mechanics.

3) In Fig. 4, the point D’ must be located at the place of X’. (AD’BE’ should be quadrangular.)

4) In Eq. (10), h’=h cos(eta) should be included, and ‘gamma’v in the forth equation is unnecessary.

5) It is better to insert ‘between the tower A and the point O’’ in the explanation of Sa’: conductor length between the tower A and the point O’ in the AD’BE’ plane. The same comment should be given for the explanation of the second term of Eq. (13) in the text.

6) All the parameters except ‘n’ in TABLE II are already defined and therefore it is not necessary to explain just after showing the table..

Reviewer: 4
Comments to the Author
The authors replied my comments on the first submsission. I do not have more comments on the paper.
回复此楼

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tableman

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)



xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝顺利!
6楼2013-11-18 10:26:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

eisenhowerkx

木虫 (正式写手)



xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
厉害厉害!!!
10楼2013-11-18 10:29:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

茅塞顿开

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶起
12楼2013-11-18 10:32:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qiuyuan

木虫之王 (文坛精英)



xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福。好好修改,祝顺利录用!
15楼2013-11-18 10:33:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

guowu

新虫 (小有名气)


送红花一朵
都是语言和格式问题,小事情。楼主便不必担心,好好修改便是。
25楼2013-11-19 08:21:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

douhaosuda

木虫 (正式写手)


恭喜啊,都是小问题,评价也不错,好好修改,加油~
26楼2013-11-19 09:39:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2013-11-18 10:18   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2013-11-18 10:22   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
.
2013-11-18 10:23   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1
2013-11-18 10:24   回复  
[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2013-11-18 10:26   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
yaoyao1458楼
2013-11-18 10:27   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
happy6179楼
2013-11-18 10:28   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2011052511楼
2013-11-18 10:31   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
D
neu23413楼
2013-11-18 10:33   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空14楼
2013-11-18 10:33   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-11-18 10:34   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
virologik17楼
2013-11-18 10:35   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
yw__57718楼
2013-11-18 10:36   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zf
shichong19楼
2013-11-18 10:37   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-11-18 10:37   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
D
iwuzetian21楼
2013-11-18 10:38   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-11-18 10:39   回复  
xiangze(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-11-18 10:39   回复  
7
王微131424楼
2013-11-18 10:50   回复  
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xiangze 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +17 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 19/950 2026-08-31 11:51 by xiangy672
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +6 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 10/500 2026-08-31 09:29 by huixian257
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +10 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 19/950 2026-08-31 08:01 by blueearth171
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +12 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 13/650 2026-08-29 00:04 by superceng
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 (EPI+1)(金币+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
信息提示
请填处理意见