| 查看: 7471 | 回复: 216 | |||
[交流]
critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences 据稿重投
|
|||
|
本人九月底在critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences投稿一篇仿生的综述，在此之前即2012年已经有一篇类似的文章发表了"biomimicry via electrospinning"，现在编辑部回信直接据稿，说文章不符合他们的期刊要求，让我另选其他期刊，但是其中一个审稿人给了不少修改意见并说修改可用。说实在的，我投稿的文章确实存在严重不足，但是经过我近一个月的修改，个人认为已经是超越了原来那一稿的，也在一定程度上做到了上述审稿人的一些修改意见，并且修改后的稿件对biomimicry via electrospinning是一种补充，更是一种进步，请问我还能重新投稿吗？如果这样，该怎么做？谢谢各位大神的回复。 注：该期刊在同类期刊排名较好，一年只有四期，大概不到一百篇文章吧。 下面是具体的回复信息： 13-Nov-2013 Dear Mr Ke: I regret to inform you that our reviewers have now considered your paper but unfortunately feel it unsuitable for publication in Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. For your information I attach the reviewer comments at the bottom of this email. I hope you will find them to be constructive and helpful. You are of course now free to submit the paper elsewhere should you choose to do so. Thank you for considering Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. Sincerely, Professor Sigmund Editor in Chief, Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences solidstateandmaterials@gmail.com Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author In this article, the author presented an overview of various biomimetic structure fabricated by electrospinning technique. The article did cover a wide range of bio-inspired structures. However, the manuscript does not have a coherent storyline and lacks in-depth discussion in each topic picked. Thus it is recommended that the article should be revised before accepted. Some concerns/suggestions of the article are as follows: In the presentation of some biomimetic structures, the pick of the artificial surface is arbitrary while the discussion is missing. Example: Page 5, Figure 5c: from the pick of the SEM image I didn’t see anything that resemble the targeted hierarchical feather surface. Also in this section the author did not discuss anything about the artificial surface, i.e. property, mechanism except for the synthesis. Page 5, line 33: from the description of the original dissertation as presented by Dr. Ma, it is kinds of arbitrary to assert that the co—polymer fiber structure resembles the structure on butterfly wings, or at least as presented in figure 6. Page 6, figure 7c vs figure 7d and figure 7e: comparing the nature and artificial surfaces, it is kinds of dubious that they can be claimed similar. Also the discussion is not enough. Page 7, linge 5: the author just wrote “They found the structure of the prepared fibers were similar to that of the spider silk.” There is no evidence to prove this simple statement, nor any discussion about the implication and applications of this finding. This is not a general discussion or conclusion section at the end of this paper, which makes the end of this article seemingly arbitrary. In general, the author might consider present the information more logically and more in-depth, with contribution from the knowledge of the author himself rather than just describing what was done by others. Another major problem with the paper is the reproduction permission of the figures. The author just get random figures from different literatures and put them together without getting permissions. Reproduction permission needs to be obtained (possibly from the publisher) and state clearly at the end of each figure to prevent potential plagiarism problems. For a review article as this is, 41 references are far from enough. This goes back to the first point, that the author could get a more systematic view of the topics by reading more papers than just commenting on one paper in each specific topic. Page 3, line 28: the author mentioned about figure 3e, but where is it? Page 4, line 12: the author mentioned that “the diameter of setae rangs (ranges) from 3mm down to several hundred nanometres (nanometers) and most are roughly 50 micron…” This is over 4 orders of magnitude difference. Can the author assure that the setae talked about is one type of setae or there are actually several different bio-structures on water strider legs? It would be kinds of astonishing that a single type of structure can have such wide range of size distribution. The author needs to work more on the language and spelling (e.g. see previous point). If possible, work with a native speaker to make the illustration clearer. In page 6, line 10-14, why there is a sudden change in the line spacing? Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The writing in this paper needs substantial work. A successful review paper's primary goal is to clearly explain the work of others and to tie the research together. The paper does not clearly do this. It also appears incomplete as there are no concluding remarks. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
退学或坚持读
已经有13人回复
-
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小?
已经有8人回复
-
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
-
免疫学博士有名额，速联系
已经有8人回复
-
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有6人回复
-
交叉科学部支持青年基金，对三无青椒是个机会吗？
已经有7人回复
-
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？
已经有15人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
哈尔滨工程大学青岛创新发展基地招聘青年教师
+1/470
-
天津科技大学邓启良教授团队 招收2026年博士生
+1/81
-
博后平台选择
+1/78
-
中国石油大学（北京）国家级大人才团队博士招生2名：化学、材料、石油工程：油田化学
+2/75
-
关于本子打包
+1/64
-
香港科技大学计算物理及流体力学课题组招收全奖博士后及博士生（2026年9月入学）
+1/49
-
意大利米兰理工大学急聘CSC公派留学博士生（物理或无机材料科学方向）
+2/30
-
教育部重点实验室和清华大学某国家重点实验室，联合培养硕生、博生，并长期招博士后
+1/27
-
加氢裂化
+1/21
-
邵阳学院食品与化学工程学院硕士调剂
+1/17
-
西班牙巴塞罗那访学、博后、留学互动
+1/12
-
青岛大学招收少数民族【少干计划】生物与医药博士研究生
+1/12
-
太原理工大学集成电路学院院长团队招收2026年博士研究生
+1/10
-
诚征女友，非诚勿扰
+3/8
-
国家杰青低维材料与器件力学团队招收博士研究生
+1/7
-
山东大学集成电路学院王凌云研究员招收2026年硕士生及联合培养硕士生
+1/4
-
顾敏院士课题组招收2026级光学工程专业博士研究生-上海理工大学智能科技学院
+1/3
-
华南理工大学宋波教授招聘材料和化学方向博士后（长期有效）
+1/2
-
生信（包括AI）博后招聘（3名）：美国德州理工大学健康科学中心
+1/2
-
澳科大诚招2026年秋季生物材料全奖博士研究生（今日16:30线上宣讲会）
+1/1
3楼2013-11-14 10:22:48
6楼2013-11-14 10:35:07
7楼2013-11-14 10:52:32
13楼2013-11-14 11:05:15
23楼2013-11-14 11:33:12
24楼2013-11-14 11:34:16
36楼2013-11-14 11:52:15
39楼2013-11-14 12:03:15
45楼2013-11-14 12:13:08
49楼2013-11-14 12:18:13
50楼2013-11-14 12:18:14
简单回复
nono20092楼
2013-11-14 10:19
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
2013-11-14 10:26
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shichong5楼
2013-11-14 10:27
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2013-11-14 10:57
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
dlbrians9楼
2013-11-14 11:02
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
readytogo10楼
2013-11-14 11:03
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
aboluo19833111楼
2013-11-14 11:04
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lmz110112楼
2013-11-14 11:04
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shinyzd14楼
2013-11-14 11:08
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
支持
lefantian12215楼
2013-11-14 11:17
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gyfwon16楼
2013-11-14 11:18
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
sddhxr17楼
2013-11-14 11:19
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wuning88818楼
2013-11-14 11:23
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
上海四缤19楼
2013-11-14 11:23
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
jibif20楼
2013-11-14 11:23
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
假大空21楼
2013-11-14 11:28
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
clarktao22楼
2013-11-14 11:31
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
段小飞25楼
2013-11-14 11:34
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ycsdzg26楼
2013-11-14 11:34
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
doctorbang27楼
2013-11-14 11:36
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
time8828楼
2013-11-14 11:37
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
wlxiao29楼
2013-11-14 11:37
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xiaomu7830楼
2013-11-14 11:38
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhoupeng8731楼
2013-11-14 11:40
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
huaxiduan32楼
2013-11-14 11:42
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
tianjun50233楼
2013-11-14 11:49
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
长风相伴34楼
2013-11-14 11:51
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
clszdy35楼
2013-11-14 11:52
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
virologik37楼
2013-11-14 12:00
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhangheng07938楼
2013-11-14 12:01
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xianzhi201040楼
2013-11-14 12:09
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
haixiawu41楼
2013-11-14 12:10
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
shiyiren42楼
2013-11-14 12:11
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zxf_201543楼
2013-11-14 12:12
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
gter_wang44楼
2013-11-14 12:12
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liulinkk46楼
2013-11-14 12:14
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhiyongwang47楼
2013-11-14 12:15
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与
handsomewood48楼
2013-11-14 12:16
回复
aming_1230(金币+1): 谢谢参与