| 查看: 2898 | 回复: 22 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
第一次投sci,大家帮我看看这样的初审意见有希望吗 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
Manuscript ID JAERO-13-0164 entitled "Bank-to-Turn Command Calculation and Singularity Control Strategy For Agile Missile" which you submitted to Journal of Aerospace Engineering, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) have recommended major revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. May I also draw your attention to the attached Editorial Checklist as the issues should also be addressed when preparing for submission of your amended version. 第一个审稿 Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author This is an original contribution to the field of GNC. Please revise English, and provide some more implementation details of the guidance scheme, simulation model used in the simulations, seeker model details, and assumptions. 第二个审稿 Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author In this paper, a new relative BTT-90 logic is given by using the roll-angle increment command. The paper also deals with the different BTT commands calculation strategy to suit different BTT situations of the guidance process. The followings should be concerned by the authors to improve the paper. 1、There are some obvious mistakes of words. The 11th word “approach” in page1line19 should be “approaches”. The 11th word “command” in page6line29 should be “commands”. There are still some words which are misused in this paper. The author could revise the paper carefully. 2、The description of the equation (6) is not clear. The guidance commands, a_yc and a_zc , get smaller in the endgame as it is showed in Fig.1(a). So the deta_gamma_bc_max gets smaller and the a_zbc* gets bigger. Then how to ensure the sideslip angle in the permitted range. 3、In Fig.16, the trajectories seemed to be very similar and can not show advantages of the new strategy in engineering applications. The author can update the figures to show the differences and advantages of the new strategy. 主编的 The paper is interesting but the authors need to further discuss the approach and the results 这个interesting的评价是积极的还是普通。小弟第一次写sci,各位高人给指点一下,谢谢 [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] |
» 猜你喜欢
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有36人回复
英文综述是否需要润色及查重
已经有5人回复
救命帖
已经有5人回复
限项规定
已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
招博士
已经有3人回复
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
18楼2013-11-02 17:07:54
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-

专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555220
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2147
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
2楼2013-10-31 21:28:28
successfulsbl
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 2006 (讲师)
- 金币: 15721.6
- 红花: 45
- 帖子: 3388
- 在线: 851.9小时
- 虫号: 286119
- 注册: 2006-10-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
3楼2013-10-31 21:31:13
youyouyanr
铁虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 144 (高中生)
- 金币: 97.5
- 散金: 8761
- 红花: 39
- 帖子: 2051
- 在线: 803.3小时
- 虫号: 1234795
- 注册: 2011-03-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理

4楼2013-10-31 21:33:08













回复此楼