24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3185)
>文献求助 (283)
>虫友互识 (235)
>导师招生 (153)
>考博 (129)
>论文投稿 (99)
>基金申请 (90)
>硕博家园 (63)
>公派出国 (58)
>博后之家 (56)
>找工作 (53)
>休闲灌水 (41)
>考研 (32)
>招聘信息布告栏 (31)
>教师之家 (27)
>高分子 (17)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ghzou

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 780.4
帖子: 397
在线: 403.9小时
虫号: 432447

[交流] Advanced materials和 Advanced engineering materials差距也太大了啊!

最近颇为不顺，精心撰写了一篇文章，投到Science四天被拒，未送审，就说文章太专，版面有限；遂改投Nature Materials，挺了18天，以为送了，结果收到拒信，说很抱歉，由于在外开会，耽误了，也说太专业，版面有限；最后改投Advanced Materials，过了20天，收到拒信如下：
Dear Dr.xxxxx,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript "xxxxxxxxxx" (adma.xxxxxxxx) to Advanced Materials.
Unfortunately, we are not able to consider it further for publication in Advanced Materials because we believe the manuscript is too specialised. As an alternative I have instead discussed your manuscript with the editors of an Advanced Materials sister journal and, to save you the trouble of resubmitting your manuscript elsewhere, we can arrange for your manuscript to be peer reviewed in the following journal:
Advanced Engineering Materials
To avoid unnecessary delays in the handling of your manuscript we ask that you make your decision before 07 Oct 2013. If you wish to transfer your manuscript after that date please contact the editorial office of your selected journal directly by email.
We hope nonetheless that this decision will not deter you from future submissions to Advanced Materials.
Yours sincerely
Xxxxx
心理落差较大，请教各位大牛，如何选择为好?本人倾向再试一下PRL，实在有些不甘心，投入的精力太多了，期望太高，难道这就是理想和现实的距离!谢谢各位。请大家多给意见，别光灌水啊，谢谢！

[ Last edited by ghzou on 2013-10-1 at 20:52 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2013-10-01 20:01:44

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

ghzou

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 780.4
帖子: 397
在线: 403.9小时
虫号: 432447

引用回帖:

68楼: Originally posted by forfree at 2013-10-01 22:38:46
我认为PRL也很难送审你的稿子。你不会认为PRL比AM容易吧？
当然凡事无绝对，如果你的稿子包含了一定的‘规律’和‘理论’，可以试试。
赶紧Acta Mater算了吧，别折腾了，别时效性也没有了。

解释了一个反常现象，可能太专业了，受众不广，这应该是被这几个杂志拒绝的主要原因，所以想试prl,谢谢。