24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2007  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

粉紫祥云

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 代谢产物的推断是否需要做方法学验证?

人生中第一次投稿被拒了~
我做的是多级质谱用于代谢产物的推断,大量数据是代谢产物结构及代谢途径的推断。其中主要审稿人的意见如下:
Reviewer #1:
However I believe that the work is not publishable as it is, because it lacks a considerable part: the validation of the method both on standard solutions and on urinary samples, at least of the two main analytes A and B. In particular the Authors should add in the paper, or carry out if not already done, a detailed paragraph reporting the results of precision, extraction yields, linearity, selectivity and accuracy, with relative tables.  
In conclusion I would suggest the manuscript may be suitable for publication only if the authors carry out the method validation data.
按照他的说法,岂不是要做方法学验证?但是,我是在做定性呀,如果做了方法学验证的话,岂不是变成定量了?
现在还在纠结中,到底要不要补数据,求各位大神指点迷津!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

粉紫祥云

铜虫 (小有名气)

oio14644

金虫 (正式写手)


【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1

粉紫祥云

铜虫 (小有名气)

scarun

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
粉紫祥云: 金币+2 2013-08-17 13:08:30
信息提示
请填处理意见