| ²é¿´: 1977 | »Ø¸´: 25 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
cy211ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎöÒ»ÏÂÕâ¸ö±à¼µÄÒâ˼£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡
|
|
|
ÎÒ¿´¼ûÕâ¸öÎÄÕÂÊDZ»¾Ü¾øÁË£¬ÄÇô±à¼ºóÃæµÄ»°ÊÇʲôÒâË¼ÄØ£¿Çë´ó¼ÒÖ¸µãһϣ¡ Your paper has been reviewed and we have carefully considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and reviewed your manuscript. We have unfortunately decided not to publish your paper in >Biosensors and Bioelectronics on this occasion. > >However, we would be happy to review your re-submission, as a new submission via the website, if you would like to revise your paper according to our reviewers' comments. In order for us to deal with this rapidly could you please provide a detailed letter containing the manuscript number and your responses specifically and clearly to EACH point raised in the referees' reports. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
276Çóµ÷¼Á¡£ÓаëÄêµç³ØºÍ°ëÄê¸ß·Ö×Óʵϰ¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÕ2026˶ʿµ÷¼Á(ѧ˶+ר˶)
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
081700 µ÷¼Á 267·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÖØÇì´óѧ085700×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³£¬×Ü·Ö308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
336»¯¹¤µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
08¹¤Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
263Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
298Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñл¯Ñ§308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
saintyoung
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 69 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 6914.5
- É¢½ð: 23
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 386
- ÔÚÏß: 248.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1418650
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¼ÆËã»úÓ¦Óü¼Êõ

23Â¥2013-07-24 20:59:58
darvincy
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 358 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 340.9
- É¢½ð: 3272
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 876
- ÔÚÏß: 676.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1106144
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ȼÉÕѧ

2Â¥2013-07-24 09:19:39
ccxshua
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 103.7
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 38
- ÔÚÏß: 24.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 832556
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-22
- רҵ: ÐÄÀíѧ
3Â¥2013-07-24 09:22:57
cy211
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 125 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2289.2
- É¢½ð: 1482
- ºì»¨: 33
- Ìû×Ó: 3645
- ÔÚÏß: 1268.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 904419
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: É«Æ×·ÖÎö
|
µ«ÊÇÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û¶¼ÊǾܾø½ÓÊܰ¡£¡£¡£¡Ò»¸öÉó¸åÈË»¹½¨Òé¿ÉÒÔͶ¸ö¶ÌµÄ½»Á÷ÎÄÕ£¡ ÄúµÄÒâ˼±à¼ÈÃÎÒ´óÐÞ£¿£¿£¿£¿ ÎҸоõµÄÒâ˼¾ÍÊǾܾøÎÒÁË£¬²»¹ý»¶ÓÎÒÒÔºó¿ÉÒÔÔÙͶ±ðµÄ¸å¼þ¸øËûÃÇ£¡£¡£¡ Reviewer #1: This is an important area of investigation. Though there are no errors in the manuscript per se, it is not scientifically very interesting. The english is poor, there are spelling errors throughout the manuscript, and there are structural errors in the manuscript. The manuscript sounds more like an experiment to be done by graduate students in the laboratory in a graduate course in Biosensors. The manuscript, is at best, accepted as a short communication, if at all. > Reviewer #2:˵ÁËһЩÎÊÌâ Taking into account these problems, the manuscript is not ready for publication.£¨×îºóÒ»¾ä»°£© > ÇóÄú°ïæ¸ø·ÖÎöһϣ¡ |
4Â¥2013-07-24 09:27:58













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
