| ²é¿´: 2283 | »Ø¸´: 25 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
cy211ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[ÇóÖú]
´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎöÒ»ÏÂÕâ¸ö±à¼µÄÒâ˼£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡
|
||
|
ÎÒ¿´¼ûÕâ¸öÎÄÕÂÊDZ»¾Ü¾øÁË£¬ÄÇô±à¼ºóÃæµÄ»°ÊÇʲôÒâË¼ÄØ£¿Çë´ó¼ÒÖ¸µãһϣ¡ Your paper has been reviewed and we have carefully considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and reviewed your manuscript. We have unfortunately decided not to publish your paper in >Biosensors and Bioelectronics on this occasion. > >However, we would be happy to review your re-submission, as a new submission via the website, if you would like to revise your paper according to our reviewers' comments. In order for us to deal with this rapidly could you please provide a detailed letter containing the manuscript number and your responses specifically and clearly to EACH point raised in the referees' reports. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ûÓÐÈκÎÏûÏ¢-ÊDz»ÊǾÍÁ¹ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÈËÆø²»ÐÐÁË
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
2026¹ú×ÔÈ»º¯ÆÀ·Ñµ½ÕË
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
2026ÄêµÄ¹ú¼ÒÉç¿Æ»ù½ðÏîĿͨѶÆÀÉóµÄйæÔòÓëж¯Ïò¡¢ÐÂÌôÕ½
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
½ñÌì»ù½ð»á³ö½á¹ûÂð£¿20260819
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÎÒÃæÉÏÍêµ°ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
·¶½øÖоÙÒ»ÎĵÄÖÐÐÄ˼Ïë
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ö»ÓÐÿÄêÕâÖÖʱºòÀ´¹ä¹äСľ³æ
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
Ã÷ÌìÓ¦¸Ã¿É²éÁË£¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
keertomorrow
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 73 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1683
- É¢½ð: 200
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 436
- ÔÚÏß: 376.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1661781
- ×¢²á: 2012-03-03
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϱíÃæ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
|
we would be happy to review your re-submissionÕâ¸ö£¬Èç¹û±à¼²»Ï²»¶£¬Ëû²»»á¼ÓÉϺóÃæÄÇÒ»¾äµÄ£¬Ö»ÓÐÇ°Ãæ¾ÜµÄÄÇÒ»²¿·Ö»°ÁË¡£ÎÒÃÇʵÑéÊÒÄǸöÈËÊÇÖÐÁ˰¡£¬µÚ¶þ´ÎͶ¸å¹ýÈ¥¶¼Ã»ÓÐËÍÉó£¬ÒòΪ±à¼¾ÍÊÇ×öËûÄǸö·½ÏòµÄ£¬Ö±½Ó¾ÍÉó¹ýÁË µÚÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈ˽¨Òé¸Ä³ÉͨѶ¾Í¸Ä³ÉͨѶºÃÁË£¬µÚ¶þ¸öÉó¸åÈ˹À¼ÆÊǾõµÃÄãÓ﷨ƴд´íÎóÌ«¶àÁËËùÒÔ¾õµÃ²»ÊʺϷ¢±í£¨¸öÈËÒâ¼û£©¡£¿ìѶ¶ÔÓïÑÔÒªÇóͦ¸ßµÄ£¬ÄãдºÃÈÃÁôѧ¹ýµÄÀÏʦ»òÕßÍâ¹úÈ˰ïÄã¸Ä¾ä×Ó£¬ÒªÊÇÒòΪÓïÑÔ´íÎóʲôµÄ±»ÏÓÆúÆñ²»ÊÇÌ«¿÷ÁË |
16Â¥2013-07-24 11:42:25
darvincy
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 358 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 340.9
- É¢½ð: 3272
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 876
- ÔÚÏß: 676.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1106144
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ȼÉÕѧ

2Â¥2013-07-24 09:19:39
ccxshua
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 103.7
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 38
- ÔÚÏß: 24.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 832556
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-22
- רҵ: ÐÄÀíѧ
3Â¥2013-07-24 09:22:57
cy211
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 125 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2285.2
- É¢½ð: 1482
- ºì»¨: 33
- Ìû×Ó: 3646
- ÔÚÏß: 1270Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 904419
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: É«Æ×·ÖÎö
|
µ«ÊÇÁ½¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û¶¼ÊǾܾø½ÓÊܰ¡£¡£¡£¡Ò»¸öÉó¸åÈË»¹½¨Òé¿ÉÒÔͶ¸ö¶ÌµÄ½»Á÷ÎÄÕ£¡ ÄúµÄÒâ˼±à¼ÈÃÎÒ´óÐÞ£¿£¿£¿£¿ ÎҸоõµÄÒâ˼¾ÍÊǾܾøÎÒÁË£¬²»¹ý»¶ÓÎÒÒÔºó¿ÉÒÔÔÙͶ±ðµÄ¸å¼þ¸øËûÃÇ£¡£¡£¡ Reviewer #1: This is an important area of investigation. Though there are no errors in the manuscript per se, it is not scientifically very interesting. The english is poor, there are spelling errors throughout the manuscript, and there are structural errors in the manuscript. The manuscript sounds more like an experiment to be done by graduate students in the laboratory in a graduate course in Biosensors. The manuscript, is at best, accepted as a short communication, if at all. > Reviewer #2:˵ÁËһЩÎÊÌâ Taking into account these problems, the manuscript is not ready for publication.£¨×îºóÒ»¾ä»°£© > ÇóÄú°ïæ¸ø·ÖÎöһϣ¡ |
4Â¥2013-07-24 09:27:58









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

20