| 查看: 5842 | 回复: 139 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
浙大学报英文版C辑 审稿完成,主编决策,求祈福,散金币(2013年8月7号最新消息,录用)
|
|||
|
计算机软件领域SCI不好中,国外期刊审稿至少半年,长则一年,伤不起,选择了较快的浙大学报C版,现在审稿完成,马上主编决策了,希望有好结果,虫友们帮我祈福祈福,感激不尽。 另一篇SCI 今年2月初投往顶级期刊Future generation computer system (IF=2.193),审稿三个月,接着进入第三方仲裁阶段,已经仲裁一个月了,希望有好结果,要是能在此期刊上发表一篇文章,散尽所有金币。 [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ] 昨天晚上收到消息,3个审稿人,2个同意接受,但须修改一些小问题,1个审稿人要求给出一些解释,语言需好好修改,编辑部给了一个月的修改时间,希望有好结果,感谢虫友的祈福,到最后来发布论文的最终结果。 附上一些简略的意见(审稿非常详细,具体到哪一页哪一句,总共10多页,就不列出来了,不过,都是些较好改的问题) Reviewer1# The paper is well-structured, well-balanced, well-argued and pleasantly to-the-point and efficient. The topic of dynamic consistency, particularly in the setting of a distributed and evolving model, is very important if not crucial, and not only so for simulation. But it is also not an easy topic. The more indirect addressing of the topic therefore is wise as well as interesting and also promising. So, in these respects the paper certainly meets the standards of the Journal. My main critic concerns the quality of English language. In my opinion it is rather moderate, certainly not weak, but also less than tolerable. I am not a native speaker of English (US-English, ...), so I might be wrong. But at more than a few places in the text, I really had to figure out what the authors could have meant. And, more often, a more adequate formulation would have made the reading more easy-going. My overall suggestion is: Accept, with revisions as indicated. Reviewer4# Overall, the paper proposed interesting ideas and conducted experiments for evaluation. However, the authors should justify their assumption on the normal distribution of the state variable ES (Hypothesis 1). The authors also should explain why their simulation setup reflects the real cases in software development. For example, the original model graph G in the simulation setup only has four vertices. Why is this choice reasonable? Finally, the authors should improve the writing of paper (both English and technical) for journal publication. [ Last edited by ljfan_nudt on 2013-6-23 at 10:48 ] 今天收到录用通知,感谢各位虫友的祈福。 [ Last edited by ljfan_nudt on 2013-8-7 at 20:56 ] |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
面上没中,邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有13人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
两块石头
已经有8人回复
初秋的晨风
已经有6人回复
学科评审组评审是指会评吗?
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有14人回复
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才!!!
已经有7人回复
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题
已经有17人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
中南大学学报(英文版)的审稿问题。
已经有17人回复
华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)审稿快不?好不好中?马上要毕业了,急啊
已经有7人回复
中南大学学报英文版会让推荐的审稿人审稿吗?
已经有18人回复
高等学校化学学报 审稿状态负责人审批完成到编委审批
已经有16人回复
投了航空学报英文版,审稿结论是minor revision,请教各位录用的可能性大吗?
已经有31人回复
讨论:文章分配给浙江大学李伯耿教授IECR审稿问题
已经有10人回复
钢铁研究学报英文版 审稿周期
已经有6人回复
50楼2013-06-13 14:25:24
14楼2013-06-13 13:38:06
简单回复
zjwcq13楼
2013-06-13 13:34
回复
ljfan_nudt(金币+1): 谢谢参与
送红花一朵
送红花一朵




















回复此楼