24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

nx8011

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 7 (幼儿园)
金币: 239.9
散金: 397
红花: 4
帖子: 181
在线: 278.6小时
虫号: 1784671
注册: 2012-04-28
专业: 昆虫学

[求助] 请大家帮看一下这样的审稿意见接受的希望大不。

Ms. No.: ---
Title: --------
Corresponding Author: Dr.--

Dear Dr. --,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to ----. I have read over your manuscript and feel that it is acceptable for publication with a few minor revisions.

Please submit your revision online within 90 days by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System for ----:

http://-----
Your username is: ******
If you cannot remember your password, please click the "Send Username/Password" link on the login page.

------

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: There is not a strong argument for investigating this plant.  The activities found were at very high concentrations.
They should provide some proof of the identity of the plant e.g. voucher specimen line 125
I think in line 128 should read "extracted with boiling ethanol under reflux"
line 188 express ---- values as % or better concentration mg/ml , not 0.04 ml to enable comparison.
line 210 how can you state that you had good activity? Your concentration of 1500 mg/ml were 30 times higher than concentration of Silva.  Check your calculations could you really dissolve 1.5 g in 1 ml of water?
It would be useful to include a Table with results of other authors to see what concentration killed the ticks.
Zorloni cited twice

Reviewer #2: The manuscript is well but minor revision is necessary
Line 125: knife mill? The type of mill must be cited.
Line 191: Figures 1 and 2
Line 198: remove space between at and 1.5
还有就是Reviewer #1:的:There is not a strong argument for investigating this plant.  The activities found were at very high concentrations.和how can you state that you had good activity? Your concentration of 1500 mg/ml were 30 times higher than concentration of Silva.  Check your calculations could you really dissolve 1.5 g in 1 ml of water?怎么回答好呢？，，这两个问题还是不太好回答，但是编辑还是给小修。

回复此楼