24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

fswang

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 25 (小学生)
金币: 7277.7
帖子: 1628
在线: 708.1小时
虫号: 542517

[交流] 收到PRL审稿意见，求围观解读

各位虫友，昨天晚上收到了PRL的审稿意见，总共两个审稿人，一个建议major revision,一个Accept，Eidtor综合考虑之后让我大修。副编辑说can be reconsidered for publication after revision. 部分真是不懂，请大家帮忙解读，主要是Eidtor的话不怎么明白。谢谢大家！！！
、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、
Dear Dr. **,

The Editorial Office has received the decision on your article.

The Reviewers' comments are as follows:

***********************************************************
//第一个审稿人的意见大致能明白
Reviewer #1:
// 第二个审稿人的意见能明白
//Editor的意见里有很多不懂的地方，尤其是后半部分。

Editor: I have now received two reviews of your paper. The first recommends Major Revision and the second recommends Accept. However, in the latter case the reviewer asks for significant revision, making his judgement one of Minor or even Major Revision. As far as I can see, all the criticisms and suggestions are justified, and in the case of those of the first reviewer, a lot of upgrading and revision is necessary. Indeed, Reviewer #1 says "a massive evaluation should be done ...", and this means what it says. Even the remark of Reviewer #2 "(2) The experimental results lack of further explanation on the performance of the trackers in handling frequent full occlusions" seems to me to demand much more than trivial re-explanation. Accordingly, I would like to encourage you to do what you can to put right *all* the criticisms of the reviewers and bring the paper up to publication standard. I ought also to say that PRL does not allow papers to be massaged gradually into shape with the help of the reviewers. At most two revisions can be allowed: one, to make good all the major criticisms and hopefully all the minor ones, and possibly another to deal with (for example) any (minor) knock-on effects that alternate reviewers then notice.

***********************************************************

In view of the comments made, the Associate Editor responsible for your article has decided that the paper can be reconsidered for publication after revision. Therefore we look forward to receiving the revised version of the article as soon as possible, but WITHIN 45 DAYS(unless the Editor specifies otherwise), together with a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised.

If we do not receive your revision within this period, your paper will be considered withdrawn. Any revision after this will be treated as a new submission and subject to a new review cycle.

To submit a revision, please login to the system at

http://ees.elsevier.com/prletters/
Your username is:****
(If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/patrec/automail_query.asp)

and select the 'Author Login' button.

You will see a menu item called "Submission Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

Best regards

Janet Amali Joseph
Journal Manager
Pattern Recognition Letters

[ Last edited by cxksama on 2013-5-3 at 14:45 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

百宝箱	Phys Rev Lett

» 猜你喜欢

垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有18人回复
职称评审没过，求安慰已经有53人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有5人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复
EST投稿状态问题已经有7人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2013-05-03 11:05:15

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

andersonlyw

新虫 (著名写手)

应助: 26 (小学生)
金币: 2958
帖子: 2846
在线: 485.4小时
虫号: 1791746

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

46楼: Originally posted by maad at 2013-05-04 12:41:31
也没有这么夸张。很多学校好像都不太重视这个的。别说985，就是在一般的高校都不一定能凭一篇Physics Review Letters就拿到教师职位。...

真没几人能中，这也是事实。一般名校的博导都没有这样的文章，最多Advance Material和Nano Letter、JACS一二篇，就算很牛了。当然如果是做前沿基础学科的，如纳米、石墨烯之类的，一篇10以上的文章不一定有多牛，但是对于半导体、陶瓷、薄膜、等离子体等传统物理学领域，一篇10.0以上的（或PRL），我感觉可以中全国百优，等同前沿学科中Nature和Science的难度。
上次听一个华科的老师说，他们现在对中Nature和Science的人也没太大兴趣。一是名校现在名额确实少，二是，在中国，有的人没本事，嫉妒别人罢了。
如果单从实力上看，在传统物理学的一篇PRL，或者前沿学科的Nature子刊水平，如果在国内完成的，他足以成为一名合格的名校博导。最后这一句你承认吗？