24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

fswang

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 25 (小学生)
金币: 7277.7
帖子: 1628
在线: 708.1小时
虫号: 542517

[交流] 收到PRL审稿意见，求围观解读

各位虫友，昨天晚上收到了PRL的审稿意见，总共两个审稿人，一个建议major revision,一个Accept，Eidtor综合考虑之后让我大修。副编辑说can be reconsidered for publication after revision. 部分真是不懂，请大家帮忙解读，主要是Eidtor的话不怎么明白。谢谢大家！！！
、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、、
Dear Dr. **,

The Editorial Office has received the decision on your article.

The Reviewers' comments are as follows:

***********************************************************
//第一个审稿人的意见大致能明白
Reviewer #1:
// 第二个审稿人的意见能明白
//Editor的意见里有很多不懂的地方，尤其是后半部分。

Editor: I have now received two reviews of your paper. The first recommends Major Revision and the second recommends Accept. However, in the latter case the reviewer asks for significant revision, making his judgement one of Minor or even Major Revision. As far as I can see, all the criticisms and suggestions are justified, and in the case of those of the first reviewer, a lot of upgrading and revision is necessary. Indeed, Reviewer #1 says "a massive evaluation should be done ...", and this means what it says. Even the remark of Reviewer #2 "(2) The experimental results lack of further explanation on the performance of the trackers in handling frequent full occlusions" seems to me to demand much more than trivial re-explanation. Accordingly, I would like to encourage you to do what you can to put right *all* the criticisms of the reviewers and bring the paper up to publication standard. I ought also to say that PRL does not allow papers to be massaged gradually into shape with the help of the reviewers. At most two revisions can be allowed: one, to make good all the major criticisms and hopefully all the minor ones, and possibly another to deal with (for example) any (minor) knock-on effects that alternate reviewers then notice.

***********************************************************

In view of the comments made, the Associate Editor responsible for your article has decided that the paper can be reconsidered for publication after revision. Therefore we look forward to receiving the revised version of the article as soon as possible, but WITHIN 45 DAYS(unless the Editor specifies otherwise), together with a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised.

If we do not receive your revision within this period, your paper will be considered withdrawn. Any revision after this will be treated as a new submission and subject to a new review cycle.

To submit a revision, please login to the system at

http://ees.elsevier.com/prletters/
Your username is:****
(If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/patrec/automail_query.asp)

and select the 'Author Login' button.

You will see a menu item called "Submission Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.

When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.

Best regards

Janet Amali Joseph
Journal Manager
Pattern Recognition Letters

[ Last edited by cxksama on 2013-5-3 at 14:45 ]

回复此楼