| 查看: 3591 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
修改稿件是否只根据编辑要求修改，请各位老师赐教！
|
|||
|
本人是菜鸟，刚投第一篇sci，审稿意见刚返回，但是不清楚是不是只按照编辑要求的4条审稿意见修改，还是两位审稿专家的意见也要修改，请各位老师们指点！谢谢 审稿意见如下： Your manuscript, JOCE-D-13-00059, "Identification and Field Evaluation of Non-host Volatiles Disturbing Host Location of the Tea Geometrid Ectropis obliqua", that you submitted to the JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY has been reviewed. Both reviews are favorable, indicating only some modest revision before publication. The points are detailed below in the separate reviews. As indicated by the Reviewers, this paper is interesting and the subject matter is suitable for the Journal of Chemical Ecology, but some major revisions are required before it can be considered for publication. I think the major issues are as follows. 1. The chirality of the compounds must be addressed. Ideally the stereoisomeric form of each compound in the volatiles from the plants should be determined. It may be acceptable to use previous literature to make these assignments. The stereoisomeric composition of the synthetic materials must be stated. 2. Reviewer 1 asks for reference to the previous literature on essential oils from these plants. This should be done, but pointing out that in the present paper volatiles have been collected from intact plants, and the composition of these volatile blends may be different from those in the corresponding essential oils. 3. I think it is clear which compounds in Table 1 have been identified in comparison with retention times and mass spectra of authentic standards. However, many of the classifications are indeed incorrect (cineole is not an alcohol, pinocarvone is not an aldehyde, terpenoids includes a multitude of functionalities, etc.). Personally I am not sure the classification is helpful, and would prefer to see compounds listed in order of retention times with retention indices. 4. Some reference to current theories of how non-host plant volatiles act should be given. Reviewer #1: The paper presents some scientific novelty that merits publication in J. Chem. Ecol. Basically, it covers two aspects: identification of volatile compounds in the essential oil of some aromatic plants and the repellent effects of some of the compounds on the tea plant pest Ectropis obliqua. The part dealing with structure assignments of volatiles (summarized in Tab. 1) is insufficiently and incompletely treated as almost none of the large amounts of papers dealing with the chemistry of the essential oils of the target plants have been cited. Quite several of the compounds, presented in this paper have been known before. In total 62 compounds were identified of which only 50% were available as authentic references for structure confirmation. The enantiomeric composition of none of the chiral volatiles has been determined. Assignments according to compound classes are incorrect. Since only the crucial 8 compounds presented in Fig. 2 are important in the context of the present paper, Tab. 1 and corresponding data in the body (see lines 111-123 etc.) should be skipped. In other words, the paper should be concentrated on applied aspects. Under these aspects, the fact that the enantiomeric compositions of neither chiral natural volatiles (linalool, cis-verbenol, camphor, terpinen-4-ol and verbenone) nor tested synthetics have been determined is causing a minor problem because the paper deals with repellent effects. To avoid redundancies, the Introduction and Discussion should be reduced. In general, quite some language polishing will be necessary, which should be carried out by a native speaker. The manuscript should be re-submitted after major modification and revision. Reviewer #2: This is an interesting piece of work that sets in place the possibility of practical development of a push-pull system for protecting tea crops from the lepidopterous pest, Ectropis obliqua, by exploiting non host plant semiochemicals. However, the impact and quality of the paper would be substantially improved by more consideration being given, particularly in the laboratory studies, to behavioural considerations regarding the mechanisms by which the non-host semiochemicals act. Of particular interest would be studies on the potential interference in location of the tea plants in the presence of the non-host semiochemicals. Merely investigating choice between non-host semiochemicals and host semiochemicals is insufficient in the light of the current hypotheses regarding the avoidance of non-hosts mediated by non-host semiochemicals. Indeed, the authors could advantageously employ more recent research results and review papers on this subject. In addition to such improvements in the paper for submission, the work is currently unsatisfactory for publication in the Journal of Chemical ecology in that:- 1. After tentative identification by mass spectrometry, identification must be confirmed by peak enhancement in GC on co-injection with authentic compounds using two GC stationery phases of differing polarity. 2. The authors were unavailable to obtain authentic compounds for all claimed identifications but need to explain exactly which. This may be acceptable but cannot be assessed without further information. 3. A number of the compounds claimed to be semiochemicals show asymmetry but the exact isomers have not been characterised. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有8人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有7人回复
-
青基如何破局
已经有7人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有10人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有11人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有6人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有6人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Applied catalysis B 修改稿上传稿件问题
已经有12人回复
- Europhysics Letters修改稿如何返回？
已经有6人回复
- 没有按编辑要求使用word软件“修订”项对稿件进行修改，怎么办？
已经有4人回复
- 稿件格式审查退回后怎么上传已修改好的文件呢？
已经有6人回复
- 如何提交修改后的稿件
已经有8人回复
- 在投稿系统最后一次上传稿件已经按照要求修改了，不需要再发给编辑了嘛？
已经有5人回复
- 关于稿件退修这样的情况，不做修改可以吗？
已经有5人回复
- 未录用但让修改的稿件，中间撤稿是否合适？
已经有20人回复
- 向各位前辈求助来了，稿子被拒了多次，我该怎么办啊？？？？
已经有28人回复
- 新人求助：Elsevier投稿格式中的问题，figure caption，参考文献等，不胜感激啊！
已经有22人回复
- 审稿人的稿件修改意见
已经有11人回复
- 文章大修，修改期限降至，能不能向主编申请延期上交修改稿件？
已经有6人回复
- 论文被拒后根据审稿人的意见修改后重新投该期刊的问题
已经有16人回复
- 论文修改意见 不懂啥意思 求助 请高手赐教啊
已经有7人回复
- 如何自己修改文章，请高手赐教！
已经有24人回复
- 金属学报退修，修改后变成了编辑加工，还要再外审吗？投过的请赐教
已经有21人回复
- 投了一篇稿件，状态已有两个月是修改录用了，我是不是应该给编辑打个电话啊？
已经有4人回复
- 稿件要求修改，能不能改通讯作者
已经有19人回复
- 稿件修改——如何回复审稿人
已经有51人回复
- 文章修改 有句话不知道什么意思 望大家赐教
已经有4人回复
- 修改后终审是什么意思？和修改后再审有什么差别？请各位赐教
已经有7人回复
- 稿件被退修，为什么没有修改意见呀
已经有19人回复
- 【求助】如何修改稿件，如何写修改说明
已经有11人回复
送鲜花一朵 7楼2013-04-05 09:58:36
wulishi8
专家顾问 (知名作家)
-
专家经验: +373 - SEPI: 5
- 应助: 1195 (博后)
- 贵宾: 0.888
- 金币: 28974.7
- 散金: 4204
- 红花: 517
- 帖子: 7711
- 在线: 1702.7小时
- 虫号: 654606
- 注册: 2008-11-15
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
- 管辖: 论文投稿交流
2楼2013-04-04 23:46:40
zypl781102
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 135 (高中生)
- 金币: 4681.1
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 702
- 在线: 159.7小时
- 虫号: 790047
- 注册: 2009-06-09
- 专业: 慢性阻塞性肺疾病
先回答编辑的，在回答审稿人的，逐一回答，注意语气，礼貌等，主要是仔细认真地回答，不能补充的要解释了，只要修回，问题不大的话基本可以搞定了，祝好运
3楼2013-04-05 00:14:17
4楼2013-04-05 04:32:26
投票:
