| ²é¿´: 1407 | »Ø¸´: 9 | ||
| ¡¾½±Àø¡¿ ±¾Ìû±»ÆÀ¼Û8´Î£¬×÷ÕßhqzhangÔö¼Ó½ð±Ò 6.5 ¸ö | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | ||
[×ÊÔ´]
¼¸ÆªCIFÎļþ¼ì²é²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×
|
||
|
¼¸ÆªÄÑϵÄCIFÎļþ¼ì²éALERT´úÂë²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×£¬ÒÔÏÂÌṩÎÄÏ×Ãû£¬ALERT´úÂë¼°Ó¢ÎÄ˵Ã÷ 1.Can X-ray Data Distinguish Bonding Effects from Vibrational Smearing ?Acta Cryst. (1976). A32, 239 2.On Enantiomorph-Polarity Estimation Acta Cryst. (1983). A39, 876-881 3.Some guidelines for publishing SHELXL-generated CIF results in Acta Crystallographica Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, e2¡Àe5 PLAT230 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAT230 Type_2 Hirshfeld Rigid-Bond Test (Acta Cryst (1976),A32,239-244 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The components of the anisotropic displacement parameters along chemical bonds are assumed to be equal in magnitude. Large differences supposedly indicate contamination of these parameters with other (unresolved) effects such as (substitutional) disorder, model or data errors and/or over refinement. Atomic sites assigned the wrong scattering type (e.g. Ag versus Br) should generate 'problem signals' with this test. Data sets corrected for absorption effects with DELREF techniques (e.g. DIFABS, SHELXA, XABS2) often show large DELU values for bonds involving the heaviest atom. Note: The original 'Hirshfeld-test' was defined in absolute terms (see F.L.Hirsfeld, Acta Cryst. (1976). A32, 239-244). The current test is with reference to the associated standard uncertainty. PLAT232 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAT232 Type_2 Hirshfeld Rigid-Bond Test (Metal-X) (Acta Cryst (1976),A32,239-244 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAT180 Type_3 Check Rounding of Cell Axes and Angles -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is unusual that more than two cell parameters end with a zero. This problem might be caused by the specification of insufficient 'meaningful' digits as compaired to the reported su. see also: W.Clegg, Acta Cryst. (2003) E59, e2-e5. Note: The values of Bonds and Angles may be seriously effected by this error. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÖÐÄÏ´óѧ»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÒ×СÒÕ½ÌÊÚ¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú£¨µÚ¶þÂÖ£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÎÞ»ú»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ90È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§26¿¼Ñе÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Äϲý´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓл¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏרҵµÄͬѧÐèÒªµ÷¼Á ¿¼ÂÇÌì½ò¸ßЧµÄ¿ÉÒÔÓʼþ»òÕß˽ÐÅ
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
26Ä격ʿÕÐÉú
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
½Î÷Àí¹¤´óѧ¹¦Äܾ§Ì¬²ÄÁÏ·½ÏòÁõËì¾ü¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026ÄêÇï¼¾Èëѧ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÄþÏÄ´óѧÍÅ´ØÐ²ÄÁÏÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏ/»¯Ñ§/»¯¹¤×¨Òµ²©Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
MIL-101Óе¥¾§ÑùÆ·Âð
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î÷±±´óѧ26Ä껯ѧ²©Ê¿ÕÐÉú
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
2Â¥2007-08-24 22:28:27
3Â¥2007-08-25 11:03:04
4Â¥2007-08-25 20:59:16
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
muzijing5Â¥
2007-09-12 09:59
»Ø¸´
ºÃ£¬Ð»Ð»·ÖÏí

wyyj29156Â¥
2011-08-22 14:12
»Ø¸´
ÎåÐÇºÃÆÀ ¶¥Ò»Ï£¬¸Ðл·ÖÏí£¡













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ºÃ°¡£¬À÷º¦