24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1116  |  回复: 5
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wangshingo

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] SCI审稿意见这样回复可以吗?谢谢大侠们

2) Response to comment: In the introduction part (Page 4, Line 10) it is written that "The aerodynamic performance of  the blades was evaluated by using comparison experiment". However the comparison with the ref. [12] is only made numerically with CFD. No experimental result is found in the manuscript. If there is an experimental comparison, the results can be presented as a figure.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out to us. Yes, the numerical results of the performance for the blades are only compared with the experimental data that were made by Saha et al. [12]. In the revised manuscript, (Page 4, Line 10) the statements of “The aerodynamic performance of the blades was evaluated by using comparison experiment.” were corrected as “…………”.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangshingo

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2013-03-04 21:38:06
Thank you for pointing this out to us. 貌似改为Thanks for your comments and suggestions, they are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper更为合适

这句话在信件里写了呀 。那生硬了呀?怎么 修改呀?嘿嘿
4楼2013-03-04 21:42:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 6 个回答

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wangshingo: 金币+5 2013-03-13 07:55:22
意思上没大问题,就是英文读起来比较生硬一些
2楼2013-03-04 21:33:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
Thank you for pointing this out to us. 貌似改为Thanks for your comments and suggestions, they are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper更为合适
咱也是有组织的人了...
3楼2013-03-04 21:38:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gwjx

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
按照审稿人意见修改了就好。
没啥大问题。
5楼2013-03-04 23:12:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[找工作] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 EZ67DG6CvcKL 2026-08-31 3/150 2026-08-31 22:23 by o3EMxHUAQDtS
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +6 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 10/500 2026-08-31 09:29 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 系统查不到 +11 董八千 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 18:06 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见