24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1802  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wangshingo

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 请问回复审稿人意见。这样回复可以吗?请大家帮我看看

1) Response to comment: In the abstract, it is mentioned that simulations and experiments have been made to optimize the shape of guide blades. However, there is no results given about these simulations and experiments in the manuscript. The optimization of guide blades is mentioned as future study at the end of conclusions.

Response: We are sorry for this mistake. The present research does not include the impact of the guide blades on the performance of the micro-wind turbine in the manuscript。 According to the Reviewer’s comment we have made correction. In the abstract, (Page 1, Line 42) “Further simulations and experiments ................the device” was deleted. (Page 1, Line 25) “In the present paper, researches neglected the impact of the guide blades on the performance of the .........” was added.
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

他山之石 论文评价

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
貌似可以The present research 把改为Our research
咱也是有组织的人了...
8楼2013-03-04 20:31:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wangshingo 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见