| ²é¿´: 6251 | »Ø¸´: 16 | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||||
zn328754293½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ͶÁËelsevierµÄÒ»¸öÆÚ¿¯,Òªmajor revision,Ð޸ĺó½ÓÊܵĸÅÂÊ? ÒÑÓÐ15È˲ÎÓë
|
|||
|
ͶÁËelsevierµÄÒ»¸öÆÚ¿¯,Òªmajor revision, Õâ¸öÊdzõÉó,ÏÂÃæÊDZ༵Ļظ´: Dear *****, > > Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see one referee is advising against publication of your study and the other referee recommends Major revision. The referee recommending rejection gives compelling reasons to do so. However, it appears that it might be possible to correct these major deficiencies with a significant amount of additional research. Therefore, if you can address most of these deficiencies over a period of time we would be pleased to reconsider your significantly improved scientific study as a new submission. However, if you choose to re-submit then you must provide a covering letter in which you clearly indicate how each of the deficiencies has been addressed or the reason why some were not addressed. Failure to provide such information will result in an automatic rejection. ʲôÇé¿ö?"The referee recommending rejection gives compelling reasons to do so"ɶÒâ˼?Ð޸ĺó½ÓÊܵĸÅÂÊÈçºÎ? Á©ÆÀÉó Ò»¸ö¾Ü¾ø,Ò»¸ö½¨Òé´óÐÞ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() µÚһƪSCI ²»Ì«¶®°¡ ,ÓоÑéµÄ˵˵ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
»ù½ðϵͳʲôÄÚÈÝҲûÓÐ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ϊʲô×ÊÖúÊý¸÷´ó¸ßУ¶¼´´Ð¸ߣ¬×Ô¼ºÉêÇëÔõô¾ÍÕâôÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O5.5.1.O5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÄÄλ¸ßÈËÖÐÁË£¬°Ñ²éѯµ½µÄ½ØÍ¼Ìù³öÀ´ÈÃÎÒ¿´¿´£¬ÈÃÎÒ³¤³¤¼ûʶ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O5.5.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÃæÉϺÏ×÷µ¥Î»¸ÇÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÉêÇëɾ³ý±¾Ìû
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
elsevierµÄÆÚ¿¯£¬ÎÄÕ±»½ÓÊÕºó´ó¼ÒÒ»°ã¶¼¶à¾ÃÄÜÊÕµ½¹ØÓÚ°æÈ¨×ªÈÃÐÒéµÄÓʼþ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎargue with editor _ElsevierÆÚ¿¯
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ͶeisiverÒ»ÆÚ¿¯£¬´ÓMajor revision£¬µ½ÏÖÔÚµÄrevision£¬ÊÇʲôÒâ˼
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ElsevierÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åÉÏ´«Í¼Æ¬µÄλÖÃÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
elsevierµÄÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åʱҪ²éÖØÁË£¿£¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åµ½elsevierÆìϵÄÒ»¸öÆÚ¿¯£¬×´Ì¬ÏÔʾacceptºó£¬»¹Òª¸Éʲô°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
ElsevierÆìÏÂʳƷÀàÆÚ¿¯Í¶¸åÂÛÎĵÄ״̬ÃèÊö
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò¸Ð¾õSCIÆÚ¿¯×öÍêMajor revisionºóÓжà´ó¼¸ÂÊÄÜÖУ¿
ÒѾÓÐ42È˻ظ´
ÍâÎÄÆÚ¿¯´óÐÞºóÉÏ´«Elsevier
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Major revision£¬Ð޸ĺóÌá½»ÁË£¬Ï£ÍûÓкýá¹û
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åµ½ElsevierÔÓ־δ¹ý¼¼ÊõÉó²é£¬Ð޸ĺóÔÙͶ»¹ÓпÉÄÜËÍÉóÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Major revision µÄÎÄÕÂÐ޸ĺóÄÜ·¢±íµÄ¿ÉÄÜÐÔ´óÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åµ½ElsevierÔÓ־δ¹ý¼¼ÊõÉó²é£¬Ð޸ĺóÔÙͶ»¹ÓÐÏ·Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
·¢Ò»¸öelsevierµÄctexÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ197È˻ظ´
ÄäÃû
Óû§×¢Ïú (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 25 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 375.3
- Ìû×Ó: 849
- ÔÚÏß: 376.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 0
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-06
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÐÄÀíѧʷ
5Â¥2013-02-07 17:37:00
q18981036
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 9 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 411.8
- Ìû×Ó: 144
- ÔÚÏß: 17.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2275151
- ×¢²á: 2013-02-05
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìåµç×ÓÆ÷¼þ

2Â¥2013-02-07 14:15:21
paperhunter
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
»¹Ã»ÏëºÃ
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +14 - SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 14603 (½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 11.659
- ½ð±Ò: 345452
- É¢½ð: 9262
- ºì»¨: 1423
- ɳ·¢: 2016
- Ìû×Ó: 127555
- ÔÚÏß: 8880.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 971012
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-14
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
esub: ½ð±Ò+2, ¹ÄÀøÓмÛÖµµÄ½»Á÷ 2013-02-10 21:56:13
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
esub: ½ð±Ò+2, ¹ÄÀøÓмÛÖµµÄ½»Á÷ 2013-02-10 21:56:13
|
ÔÚÁ½¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÖÐÒ»¸öÇ¿ÁÒ·´¶Ô·¢±í£¬ÁíÒ»¸ö½¨Òé´óÐÞµÄÇé¿öÏ£¬Ã²ËÆÔð±à¸øÁËÖØÍ¶µÄ»ú»á£¬ËµÃ÷ËûÈÏΪ¥Ö÷µÄÎÄÕÂÓпÉȡ֮´¦¡£Èç¹ûÂ¥Ö÷Äܹ»²Î¿¼Éó¸åÒâ¼û²¹³äʵÑ飬Ôö¼ÓÑо¿Êý¾ÝºÍÏà¹ØµÄ·ÖÎö£¬×ÐϸÐ޸ģ¬ÈÏÕæ»Ø¸´£¬Ð޸ĵ½Î»µÄ»°»¹ÊÇÓнÓÊÕµÄÏ£Íû¡£ ps. The referee recommending rejection gives compelling reasons to do so Ö¸µÄÊÇÉó¸åÈ˸ø³öÁ˲»¿É¿¹¾ÜµÄÀíÓɽ¨Òé¾Ü¸å¡£ |

3Â¥2013-02-07 15:25:38
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
4Â¥2013-02-07 15:40:48










»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
30