编辑回复如下:
Dear XX,
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.
For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Yours sincerely,
XXX, PhD
Associate Editor
Electrochimica Acta
因为审稿人并没有说文章的创新型问题,而是提了关于论文结构不合理的问题,想根据拒稿意见好好改改再投回去,cover letter怎么写呢?
编辑会的信中“they are advising against publication of your work。”但是编辑附加的拒稿意见只有一个,而且我投这个期刊时也只有一个审稿人的意见。想问问,编辑这么回复是套话吗,还是有其余的审稿人,编辑只给了我一个审稿人的意见呢??
这个也不能够说是编辑不感兴趣,编辑一般还是按照审稿人的意见来决定的。审稿人说你的文章结构不合理,换句话说就是压根还算不上是一篇学术论文呗,所以编辑拒了也很正常啊。在回信中首先感谢编辑和审稿人,然后强调你已经按照前次的审稿意见仔细的修改过文章了,然后详细的列出一条一条的答复(跟正常修改时的Response to Review一样),总的来说就是你的cover letter里面要包含着一个Response to Review。