24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1045  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

fengzhou85

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 求助如何修改审稿人的意见

第一篇英文,三个审稿人,大修。其中两个人的意见是修改引言,结论,摘要,不涉及到具体内容。但是另外一个审稿人的意见非常具体,还提到要求补做实验。但是老板认为不需要(相关参考文献中也没有采用这种实验方法进行分析的),大家帮忙看看,提点意见给我,先谢谢了。

具体的修改意见为:

  The part for the TG-DSC analysis must be rewritten again, since there are several misunderstandings.
  In the case of simultaneous measurement of DSC and TG, two different effects can be observed from the DSC signal, in the degradation area of the studied sample. The first one is the decomposition of the sample which is always an exothermic event for a DSC measurement and the second one is the mass loss due to the decomposition which is an endothermic effect. The DSC signal in this case will present a plateau or an endothermic/exothermic peak since the final signal is the sum of the exothermic phenomenon due to the decomposition, and the endothermic one due to the mass loss of the sample. The shape depends on the enthalpy of the two events.
  In addition, two steps of mass loss have been recorded for the samples under study. The first one can be found in the area of 30 - 200 C, with one step of mass loss for the samples RSF and ALK-SF and two overlapped mass loss steps for the other samples. The author must discuss this difference while taking into account that no direct information can be obtained about the part of the sample that decomposes, from the TG measurements.
  The samples must be studied with TG-MS or other techniques in order to be sure about the decomposition scheme. The second area of mass loss is among 200 – 400 C, during which two overlapped decomposition steps are obvious. This is more obvious from the DTG figure. For this area also other techniques must be used for the determination of the decomposition scheme. Using the above comments the possibility of the silane grafting must be discussed.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
fengzhou85: 金币+4, 有帮助, 谢谢 2013-01-06 14:42:34
如果不补充实验需要充分的理由,特别是在没有文献中的数据可以参考的情况下。楼主可以在老板那里寻求帮助,尽可能令人信服地回复审稿人。
咱也是有组织的人了...
5楼2013-01-06 13:30:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

匿名

用户注销 (职业作家)


★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
fengzhou85: 金币+2, 有帮助, 谢谢 2013-01-06 14:41:44
本帖仅楼主可见
2楼2013-01-06 10:49:29
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
fengzhou85: 金币+2, 有帮助, 谢谢 2013-01-06 14:41:57
按你老板的意见办,不想修改的地方要予以合理的解释
3楼2013-01-06 13:15:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

slmyeye

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
fengzhou85: 金币+2, 有帮助, 感谢 2013-01-06 14:42:19
按照你老板的意思去做,如果确实觉得某些地方不需要修改,可以予以说明
4楼2013-01-06 13:18:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见