24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3874)
>文献求助 (300)
>导师招生 (220)
>虫友互识 (130)
>论文投稿 (121)
>博后之家 (93)
>考博 (90)
>休闲灌水 (90)
>硕博家园 (69)
>考研 (68)
>公派出国 (65)
>基金申请 (60)
>论文道贺祈福 (52)
>教师之家 (52)
>找工作 (40)
>招聘信息布告栏 (27)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

glai8818

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 11 (小学生)
金币: 4017.1
帖子: 2579
在线: 1427.4小时
虫号: 344387

[交流] JPC据稿，大家帮忙看看意见，如果适当修改可以再投哪些期刊？

JPC投稿一个月据稿，这里只给个编辑的整体意见吧。第一个审稿人的意见专业而苛刻，有些也正是我担心的，差不多要我重新进行所有的实验，实验确实存在一些缺憾，当时没有考虑周全，如果重新做一遍至少要三四个月吧，但不保证能有比现在更好的结果；有的是由于英文水平差，一些地方表达简略了些，如果不做实验而是适当修改可以再投哪些期刊？希望有类似经历的朋友给个意见。
Dear Dr. **:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. After careful consideration of their comments (and my own evaluation of the manuscript), I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry. Reviewer 1 has very critical opinions about the experiments and interpretation and thinks that the research design cannot be published in JPC. Reviewer 2 is slightly more positive, but also requires major changes.

Unfortunately, we are unable to accept all of the sound work submitted to the journal. We appreciate your choice of The Journal of Physical Chemistry as a possible forum for presentation of your work.

With sincere regards,

[ Last edited by glai8818 on 2013-1-5 at 21:39 ]

回复此楼