24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3070)
>虫友互识 (1166)
>休闲灌水 (602)
>导师招生 (66)
>文献求助 (41)
>论文道贺祈福 (26)
>基金申请 (26)
>论文投稿 (24)
>微米和纳米 (23)
>博后之家 (22)
>硕博家园 (22)
>考研 (22)
>考博 (20)
>教师之家 (19)
>公派出国 (17)
>找工作 (13)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

genglu313

金虫 (著名写手)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 1375.8
帖子: 1038
在线: 46.1小时
虫号: 336596

[交流] 历时近80天，审稿结果。求分析。-International Journal of Chemical Kinetics

编辑给回信主要意见：
Below you will see the comments of the reviewer. I share their substantial concern and reservation, and am unable to accept the manuscript in its present form. My decision is therefore to reject the manuscript, but leave open the possibility of a resubmission.

My sense is that the work is incomplete, but may be publishable if you were to substantially augment and clarify the work. In particular I would expect to see more and better examples of application, comparison with current practices, and greater discussion of limitations etc. With such changes I would reconsider it for publication. This submission will be assigned a new number, and will be considered a new submission. Please reference this paper in your cover letter with the reworked manuscript.

Thank you for sending your manuscript to us for consideration.

We do hope to see your work again, and look forward to perhaps publishing it at some point in the future.

审稿人就1个（也不知道是多个，就给我看一个；还是就一个审稿人= =！），ta的意思主要是2个，然后综合了一下就说建议拒稿了。
1）内容无法涵盖广泛的化学反应，只有一部分能涵盖（承认这部分的作用），应对另一部分要进行讨论，并且要增加反应实例（这个我之前就想过，也找了，这方面较少。。。而且现有的实验数据也不是很好。）
2）如果作者想发表，就扩充讨论部分，明晰结论（我感觉还是ta说的对实际应用无法很广泛地涵盖的意思）

感觉编辑较为认同这篇文章，希望改好后再投。我想为啥不让“大修”非要“拒稿后再投”？
另外，虫友感觉，按要求修改了，能录用么？
如果我想改好再投，现在需要先给编辑回封信表示一下感谢么？（悲催，拒稿了还在想要不要感谢ta。。。）
这个期刊影响因子不高，就1。值不值改啊。纠结中

回复此楼