| 查看: 4739 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
粪丁银虫 (小有名气)
打腐败
|
[交流]
各位大侠，最近投ACS nano，五个审稿人，一个始终坚持拒稿，已经修改两次了 已有3人参与
|
||
各位大侠，最近投了一篇ACS nano，八月份开始投的，九月初给了意见，重修给了六个月时间，三个小修，一个建议换杂志，还有一个拒了重投。然后按审稿人的意见狠狠的补了大量的实验数据，回复意见大概有4000多字。十月又投了，十一月份回来意见，60天修改时间，还是五个审稿人，两个直接接受，两个小修，还是有一个建议换杂志。后面又好好修改了一下，十一月底投出去，回来四个审稿人，三个直接接受，还有一个审稿人坚持建议换杂志 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有5人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有54人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 各位大侠，帮我看看老外审稿人提出的一个问题。谢谢你们了！
已经有7人回复
- 关于推荐审稿人 有一句话看不懂，请教各位大侠！
已经有4人回复
- 审稿人是什么意思？请各位大侠相助，不甚感激！
已经有6人回复
- 请问各位大侠，审稿人给这句话是啥意思啊？
已经有4人回复
- 一次修改后ACS审稿人老说英语不好，该怎么办啊？
已经有16人回复
- 请问各位大侠，审稿人是想说我统计部分出什么问题了？
已经有11人回复
4楼2012-12-16 01:20:17
粪丁
银虫 (小有名气)
打腐败
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 100.5
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 163
- 在线: 71.6小时
- 虫号: 839905
- 注册: 2009-09-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
|
第一次： Recommendation: Publish in a different journal. the manuscript can not meet the novelty criteria of ACS Nano for publication. Additional Questions: Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: No If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field: It is unlikely to be improved to be in the top 15%. Is it appealing to a broad audience?: Yes Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: No Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: Yes Significance: High Novelty: Moderate Broad interest: High Scholarly presentation: Moderate 第二次：As the method described in this manuscript has limited improvement over previous research, I recommend the authors try a different journal. Additional Questions: Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: No If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field: Is it appealing to a broad audience?: No Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: No Significance: Moderate Novelty: Moderate Broad interest: Moderate Scholarly presentation: Moderate 第三次：Recommendation: Publish in a different journal. Comments: In my judgment, this submission is not of broad enough interest for ACS Nano. The work described in this manuscript, pertaining to the preparation of a composite of graphene with MnO2, is interesting and of high technical quality, but this work is better suited for a more specialized journal in the areas of materials chemistry or electrochemistry. Additional Questions: Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: No If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field: It is unlikely to be improved to be in the top 15%. Is it appealing to a broad audience?: No Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: No Significance: Moderate Novelty: Moderate Broad interest: Moderate Scholarly presentation: High 各位大侠建议建议，我该咋弄 |
2楼2012-12-15 22:55:43
decahedron
银虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 37 (小学生)
- 金币: 334.9
- 散金: 2446
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 782
- 在线: 249.3小时
- 虫号: 1379489
- 注册: 2011-08-25
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 结构化学
5楼2012-12-16 12:00:35
粪丁
银虫 (小有名气)
打腐败
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 100.5
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 163
- 在线: 71.6小时
- 虫号: 839905
- 注册: 2009-09-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
6楼2012-12-16 15:33:20