| 查看: 4558 | 回复: 26 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Applied Optics 大修后被拒,该如何是好,请各位虫友指教 已有9人参与
|
|||
|
初审两个审稿人,一个同意发表,一个不同意,编辑给的大修,修改完编辑又返回给那个不同意发表的审稿人,一个月后被拒,意见如下: Dear Sir ***: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely, **** ****, Topical Editor, APPLIED OPTICS ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 After reading thru the authors responding letter, I was not convinced by the authors’ arguments. The major problem was focused on the linear Interpolation estimation of the unknowns that the authors proposed for wavefront estimation of large amount of shearing. It is true that for 2-D wavefront estimation, if wavefront resolution is based on the shear amount, the spatial resolution can be low for the large shears. And if you want to obtain a high spatial resolution estimation, you have to take more measurements. This is the price we should pay at present for high resolution estimation. Compare to the small shear (such as one pixel shear), wavefront estimation based on large shear (more than one pixel) with proposed method does have an advantage of high resolution in wavefront estimation as the small shear, except for linear interpolation approach for the wavefront unknowns, which is not acceptable. If the interpolation could be used for estimating the unknown values, why the authors do not use the linear interpolation of wavefront slope? At least it is more accurate and more reasonable than the linear interpolation of the unknown wavefront. It is also true that for the large shear the signal to noise ratio could be higher, but we are not clear how the authors would treat the 2pi(or one pi) phase ambiguity for the large shear scenario, which can be a big problem. For the finite difference based wavefront estimation, it is approximate method even if the authors think it is “ exactly accurate in principle”. It is generally not acceptable in the field of wavefront metrology if a method is principally incorrect even if the induced error is only 1-5% for some specific simulation examples. Of course, you can still use it as your own purpose, but it is not proper to publish to mislead the academia. 各位怎么看?重投还是改投? |
» 猜你喜欢
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有3人回复
实名举报:华南理工大学物理与光电学院副院长李志远婚内两次出轨女学生(博士)
已经有16人回复
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组|2027级博士研究生招生公告
已经有11人回复
上海工程技术大学激光智能制造课题组招收博士研究生
已经有10人回复
申博发邮件
已经有11人回复
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有7人回复
各位大神,目前国内有哪些比较好用的逆合成软件?
已经有12人回复
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
国社科系统bug了,是不是要放榜了?
已经有9人回复
17楼2012-12-13 10:12:07
3楼2012-12-12 10:49:55
hustoe2011
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 178 (高中生)
- 金币: 22860.1
- 散金: 9962
- 红花: 47
- 帖子: 22054
- 在线: 4425.9小时
- 虫号: 1333598
- 注册: 2011-06-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光学和光电子材料

4楼2012-12-12 13:14:17
5楼2012-12-12 13:33:46










回复此楼