24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 632  |  回复: 3

灵响2010

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 二审回稿意见,帮忙翻译下

Previous referee´s as well as editor´s recommendations on analysis of peptides should, in my opinion, be followed. At least it should be shown that R280 of the w.t. enzyme is actually targeted by trypsin (MS or MS/MS analysis) alternatively showing a slower build up peptide fragments by peptide capillary e-phoresis. MS or MS/MS or capillary e-phoresis may be commercially available as a service. As a further alternative the authors may run SDS-page - the risk being that fragments is not picked up, but at least showing differences in a disappering band (time course w.t. versus at least R280 or the triple mutant). If it is so that the enzyme activity detection earlier detect tryptic digestion - this would be a way to indicate the greater sensitivity by use of enzyme activity.  The authors claim (in referee response) that enzyme activity is a more sensitive way to analyse trypsin attack, but as it stands it is hypothetical and an analysis of peptide fragment build up would add on to  such a hypothesis (if its needed to use a prolonged incubation time to show differences between w.t. and the R280 mutant) or alternatively, as suggested above, just analyse disappearance.       第一次投文章,怕理解错了编辑的意思,哪位好心人帮忙翻译下,大概意思,不甚感激~~~
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
编辑和审稿人的要求,你最好照办。上次好像你没有?
Previous referee′s as well as editor′s recommendations on analysis of peptides should, in my opinion, be followed.
2楼2012-10-31 21:15:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

digghost

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
but as it stands it is hypothetical and an analysis of peptide fragment build up would add on to  such a hypothesis 。这句话是关键,
呵呵了
3楼2012-11-01 07:45:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

982121012

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

太专业了,看不懂。
不抛弃也不放弃,所以我们就叫钢七连.
4楼2012-11-01 08:32:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 灵响2010 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见