24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sjzhang156

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 77 (初中生)
金币: 2075.3
帖子: 1033
在线: 196.8小时
虫号: 995395

[交流] 这样的情况还有大修的必要吗

The manuscript has been reviewed by three experts. Their recommendations are highly divergent. Reviewers #1 recommends rejection of the manuscript. Reviewers #3 is also highly critical, but this reviewer recommends that the manuscript may possibly be considered for publication after a major revision. In contrast, Reviewers #2 is positive. This reviewer recommends acceptance of the manuscript.

The comments of Reviewers #1 and - to a lesser extent - Reviewers #3 seem to disqualify the manuscript. However, because of the positive comments of the latter two reviewers, the authors deserve a chance to respond and to improve their manuscript in line with the recommendations of the reviewers. The authors should carefully address all issues raised by the reviewers and they should improve the manuscript in line with the recommendations of the reviewers. If necessary, they should perform additional experiments.
文章已经重投过了，有一个审稿人从始至终否定，感觉一点看不到文章的优点，所有的都是缺点，我觉得是常识的东西他觉得都是错的，我觉得自己是无法说服他了，准备全部以反驳的形式回复了，录不录取不管了，太累了。现在纠结的时要不要和编辑说说无法按照这个审稿人的意见修改，编辑既然不顾他的反对让我修改还会再给他审吗？我估计编辑给我大修是因为来回折腾我半年了，我本来新的东西都成了旧的了。遇到固执又有偏见的审稿人真是伤不起。

回复此楼

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2012-10-17 17:53:05

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

sjzhang156

银虫 (著名写手)

应助: 77 (初中生)
金币: 2075.3
帖子: 1033
在线: 196.8小时
虫号: 995395

引用回帖:

9楼: Originally posted by letianyao at 2012-10-18 13:19:25
你应该认真按照审稿人意见修改并逐条答复，一定要注意语气客观、论据充分：如果完全接受审稿人意见，那就致谢并注明修改结果。如果不同意，更要给出依据和解释。当然如果实在觉得有审稿人的能力有问题，可以罗列充分 ...

我觉得我对那个审稿人语气确实不够客观，冷静，主要是他的纯粹恶意深深的表现在字里行间，让你非常明显能够感觉到，也不指望说服他了。3个人，其余一个完全同意，一个让修改。编辑说考虑到2个审稿人意见比较好，给我个大修的机会。我就寄希望他不会再找那个极品审稿人了。