应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 求助完结 » reject and resubmission 大家给我看看审稿意见
53/1返回列表
查看: 4205  |  回复: 31
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] reject and resubmission 大家给我看看审稿意见

投了一篇sci ，审稿意见如下：
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s), I must decline the manuscript for publication in the European Food Research and Technology at this time. However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments.
Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered.
You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.
Once you have revised your manuscript, go to http://and login to your Author Center. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.
Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the European Food Research and Technology, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.
I look forward to a resubmission.
Sincerely,

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
I strongly recommend that English language must be checked throughout the text.
Abstract should be re-organized as: objective, methods, results and conclusion.
I think the Keywords are not appropriate. (maybe:......)
In the Introduction section, I think it would be better to focus on the possible functional properties of ** (is there any?) and then, show that there is no information about its **potential (page 2, lines 56 and 57; page 3, lines 4 to 7).
Lines 10 to 12, Introduction section: Use past tense.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
-English should be greatly improved.
-Figure 1: the legend does not correspond to the figure.
-Figures 1 and 2 should be merged.
-I do not understand in Table 1 the basis on which component the concentration degree was calculated.
-It is not easy to understand that......
-Figure shows, not Figure showed.
-The abbreviation of tryptophan is Trp, not Try.
请问1、 我这个还有希望吗？是不是就是已经拒稿了？只是主编很婉转！
2、如果重新投稿，也没有给出投稿时间，要多久返回？
3、更重要的是，信中说拒稿重投这已经很严重了，似乎说明稿子不好，但审稿人的意见为什么这么少？没有实质性的问题。主要是语言和一点小毛病。按照审稿意见也就是小修吧。 不知道接收的几率大不大？
4、 有人投过european food research and technology ,reject and resubmission 后被接受的吗？

[ Last edited by 猪会飞 on 2012-10-18 at 11:40 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
1楼2012-10-17 17:35:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaoluer737

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
主编偏重于接收您的稿件，只是碍于审稿人的说法。
最主要是要修改您的文章英语语法或表达习惯。
有很大机会呢。
祝您好运！
赞一下 回复此楼
苦过才知甜。
23楼2012-10-18 13:45:36
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 32 个回答

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
秋天白云: 金币+1, 感谢交流~! 2012-10-18 07:55:45
猪会飞: 金币+10, 代发帖人发放 2012-10-18 11:39:35
sunying625: 金币+10 2013-03-02 10:26:36
这个机会很大，啊，虽然是大修，主要是第一个审稿人的意见修改难一些，第二个的基本就是语言和格式问题，容易修改
所以一定不要放弃，修改后重投，这个相当于大修

major revision 一般在3个月内修回即可，O(∩_∩)O~
赞一下(2人) 回复此楼
2楼2012-10-17 17:48:20
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunying625

铜虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by wellyy2005 at 2012-10-17 17:48:20
这个机会很大，啊，虽然是大修，主要是第一个审稿人的意见修改难一些，第二个的基本就是语言和格式问题，容易修改
所以一定不要放弃，修改后重投，这个相当于大修

major revision 一般在3个月内修回即可，O(∩_ ...

以前看过你回复别人的帖子，今天能得到你的指导感觉很亲切谢谢！
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-10-17 18:17:02
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

对啊，按照审稿人的意见一条一条的，一点一点的回答修改，不要疑惑，审稿人的意见就是真理，能修改的尽量修改，不能实现的说明理由或给出参考文献支持你的意见。
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2012-10-17 19:02:46
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 32 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭