24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

liuruiyi324

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 171.9
红花: 2
帖子: 57
在线: 37小时
虫号: 1139179
注册: 2010-11-05
性别: GG
专业: 金属材料的微观结构

[求助] 修回一天后直接显示Awaiting EIC Decision

如题，小弟的文章已经第二次修改了。意见是建议发表，但是也提了几点意见，具体如下：
1.The Introduction section needs to be rewritten to explain the relevant background work and the authors’ contribution. The authors did not describe what is already known about the creep behavior of the alloy they are investigating and how their own work is different.
2.What novel scientific insights about the material behavior emerge from the authors’ work? What unsolved problem the authors are attempting to solve? The authors should have provided sound justification for the research explaining how their work was an improvement upon the state-of-the-art or how it addressed unsolved problems in the published research literature.
3.The revisions have addressed only some aspects. Unfortunately, a number of new mistakes of English grammar and sentence structure have been introduced in the new material besides the mistakes that existed in the original manuscript. The initial review was meant to critique the content and mistakes in writing and presentation were not pointed out. Below are a few randomly found mistakes in the revised manuscript; many more mistakes exist but are not listed. The paper should not be allowed to move forward unless all mistakes have been corrected.
在我上传修改稿一天后，直接显示Awaiting EIC Decision，是不是要悲剧啊？？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

1楼 2012-09-19 09:03:38

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuruiyi324

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 5 (幼儿园)
金币: 171.9
红花: 2
帖子: 57
在线: 37小时
虫号: 1139179
注册: 2010-11-05
性别: GG
专业: 金属材料的微观结构

liuruiyi324: 回帖置顶 2012-09-20 11:43:00

引用回帖:

8楼: Originally posted by nono2009 at 2012-09-19 11:48:37
好消息的可能性较大。

唉，竟然等到的是第三次修改意见。。
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Following revision, the manuscript has substantially improved. However, a few critical changes are needed:
The authors should present the EDS and x-ray diffraction data. They have concluded all of the microstructural results on the basis of SEM imaging only; this is not sufficient.
In the abstract, please correct the spelling of MPa.
让我加试验。。。怎么前两次不说。。。郁闷啊。。