24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1179  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lynn097

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 大家觉得这种意见还有必要重新投吗?

Your submission entitled "******" has been received by the journal.
     While your submission is of interest to the journal, your manuscript does not meet the following criteria, we are returning the manuscript to you before the review:
1. Lack of scientific originality/novelty: Authors need to further justify that the manuscript contains sufficient new materials or information that can contribute to the existing pool of knowledge
2. Literature survey is not sufficient to present the most updated R&D status for further justification of the originality of the manuscript. You should carry out a thorough literature survey of papers published in our journal and a range of top energy journals so as to fully appreciate the latest findings and key challenges relating to the topic addressed in your manuscript and to allow you to more clearly present your contribution to the pool of existing knowledge.

At this time, your submission will be rejected from the journal but please feel free to re-submit to the journal once the aforementioned comments have been addressed.d comments have been addressed.

这是主编直接审的稿子,还没有投出去就被他打了回来~
大家觉得还有重新投的必要吗?谢谢啦
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

好的东西

新虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
这个不是文章创新性的问题,而是质量的问题,换个期刊吧
11楼2012-08-24 10:03:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
感觉确实没什么必要了,主编的决定,
2楼2012-08-22 01:44:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiajimu

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

这个不是文章创新性的问题,而是质量的问题
3楼2012-08-22 01:44:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

snaillbf

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
个人感觉没有必要,编辑的意见不是很好,换个杂志吧
4楼2012-08-22 05:48:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见