24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

kyoryu

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 4991.4
红花: 1
帖子: 287
在线: 63.9小时
虫号: 617963
注册: 2008-10-06
性别: GG
专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构

[求助] 文章投稿连续被编辑拒，根本不送审。求分析，求推荐杂志

最近的一个工作，通过第一原理计算预言了一种BN和C的复合材料，具有类似石墨烯的二维结构，并且计算分析了其带隙，磁性，和光学性质。开始投到了JACS上，打算冲一下，不行的话得到审稿人意见也不错，结果连编辑那关都没过。之后投Carbon，投PRB，投JCP，都是直接被编辑拒。理由都是模版式的不适合该期刊，或者建议投更专业的期刊。文章的格式没问题，英文应该也差不多，不是很差的那种。迷茫中求虫友帮忙分析下原因，并求推荐合适的期刊。以下附上各杂志拒信：

JACS：
I have carefully read your manuscript. Although I think that your manuscript certainly should be published, I don't think that your computational results on materials that are unlikely to be synthesized in pure form in the near future are likely to be of significant interest to the broad readership of JACS. Consequently, I believe that, were I to send your manuscript out for review, the Referees would recommend publication of your manuscript in a more specialized journal.
Therefore, I have decided not to send your manuscript out for review. My decision will enable you to submit your manuscript to a more specialized journal now, rather than waiting a month or more for the reports from JACS Referees.
During the the past thirteen years, my initial assessments of how Referees will regard manuscripts have proven to be very accurate. In those cases where an author has requested that I send a manuscript for review, despite my own prediction that the Referees would not recommend publication of it in JACS, the Referees have, without any prompting from me, almost always made the recommendation I expected. Thus, the result of my sending such manuscripts for review has only been to delay by 1 - 3 months the submission of those manuscripts to other journals.
I trust you will be successful in publishing your manuscript in another, more specialized journal; but thank you for considering JACS for publication of your manuscript.

Carbon：
The title tells me that this paper is NOT about a carbon material. It is about a carbon that contains carbon. Not the same! Therefore I must reject it.

PRB：
Thank you for submitting your work to Physical Review B. The editors
have examined this manuscript and regrettably conclude that it is
unsuitable for our journal. We make no judgment on the correctness of
the work, only on its suitability according to our other criteria.

JCP：
I believe that your manuscript would have a better audience in another journal.

[ Last edited by kyoryu on 2012-7-28 at 11:19 ]

回复此楼