24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2245  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

plantae

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] revision需要对reviewer提出的每个问题都进行修改吗 已有11人参与

状态是:
Decision: Provisional Acceptance/Request Revision;

editor 的意见:
On the basis of the advice received and my own evaluation, I believe
that, pending revision, this article may ultimately be acceptable for publication in
Plant physiology

Both reviewers provided useful comments concerning the scientific aspects of the
paper, as well as (particularly in the case of Reviewer #2) catching many, mostly
small, mistakes that need correcting. You will see that this reviewer recommended
that the manuscript be rejected, though strongly encouraged resubmission. Reviewer #1
also raised some important questions that need to be addressed. In order for your
revision to be accepted, you will need to address each of the substantive comments
and criticisms point by point in a response to me, noting how you have modified the
paper or explaining why you have not chosen to do so. Neither reviewer has
recommended that additional data are required for the paper to be acceptable, so
there should not need to be new data collection.

Reviewer #2 has listed many small matters (listed by page) that you can correct
without needing to tell me that you have corrected each one. Despite these many
problems (also noted in general by Reviewer #1), I congratulate you on producing a
paper that, while not always written in idiomatic English, is for the most part very
clear and understandable. I very much appreciate the effort that this requires. If
possible, it would be useful for you to ask for some assistance from a native English
speaker to improve the manuscript further, but I do not consider this a requirement,
as long as the science is of a high quality and the major comments are addressed.   

是不是只要回答一下reviewer的问题就行了,不用再加数据了?
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

百宝箱

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liangchangli

木虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
审稿人并未要求你补新数据,只是要求你逐条回答他的问题,另外感觉他们并未提出什么学术性问题,主要是语言方面。你只要用心回答他们的问题,切记没有充分证据不要反驳他们。祝你好运
lzljxst
5楼2012-07-20 08:00:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

ahnushikun

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
一定要,否则可能会拒的。祝好运!!
3楼2012-07-20 01:43:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

changh

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
如果审稿人提出的问题或要求修改的评述是完全正确的,一定要修改,否则拒稿的可能性很大。但是如果楼主觉得自己是对的,审稿人的说法不合适,必须进行说明。
祝福楼主!
北方
4楼2012-07-20 06:24:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liyingsong

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
对啊,这是审稿人认为你说的不是很清晰,现在你需要阐明你自己的东西
6楼2012-07-20 08:25:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见