24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2709  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

rainmanj

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 论文一审意见返回,麻烦各位群友多指点一些修改意见,拜谢!

返回的意见如下,请各位群友多提提如何修改文章的意见,第一次投英文期刊,没经验,谢谢了!
The paper investigats the consensus for multiagent systems with delays via the use of Nyquist criterion and frequency-domain analysis. Overall, this is an interesting work with nice organization. Technical proof is sound as well.

There are some comments for the authors to consider.

-As is well known in MAS community, multi-agent consensus problem with delay (various delays including input delay, coupling delay,
random communication delay, etc) involved has been systematically investigated in different settings. The followings are some works
which have been missed by the authors but need to be commented/compared with their work as they relate closely to the
investigated topic.

Note that Ref. [1] also considers different delays for agents with
single-integrator dynamics in continuous-time setting; and Refs. [5]
& [4] consider respectively the communication delay (non-uniform and
time-varying delays) for single-integrator and double-integrator
agents in sampled-data setting. Ref. [2] considers the input delay
for single-integrator agents in continuous setting with switching
communication topologies and Ref. [4] considers the
double-integrator case.

[1] Delay Robustness in Consensus Problems. Automatica, 46(8): 1252-1265, 2010.

[2] On average consensus in directed networks of agents with switching topology and time delay. International  Journal of Systems
Science 42(12): 1947-1956, 2011

[3] Second-order consensus for multi-agent systems with switching topology and communication delay. Systems & Control Letters 60(6):
390-397, 2011

[4] A sufficient condition for convergence of sampled-data consensus for double-integrator dynamics with nonuniform and time-varying
communication delays, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2012.2188425, 2012

[5] State consensus for multi-agent systems with switching topologies and time-varying delays. International Journal of
Control, 79(10): 1277-1284, 2006

Other comments:
- What does it mean by connected as mentioned in the bottom 3 lines
on page 3 (see, "... the minimum requirement of digraph G is said to
be connected is ...."?
回复此楼
坚持就是胜利!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

happy617

新虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
rainmanj: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-07-12 17:27:53
针对审稿人的问题逐一回答,同时在修改的地方进行标注,尽量节省再审的时间。给审稿人带来方便,中的几率就会很大。
3楼2012-07-12 11:03:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

hls85915

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

科研工具版——沙漠之胡

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主 修改意见一定要逐条的回答审稿人,先肯定审稿人的意见,在说明自己的想法
哈哈
2楼2012-07-12 10:59:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liuhaiying918

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
rainmanj: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2012-07-12 17:29:14
编辑首先肯定了楼主的工作,审稿意见就是针对参考文献中和你的工作比较接近的几个文章,让你做一下比较,增加几个对比结果。参考文献都给你清楚列出来了。另外问你他之处的那几句话你想表达什么意思。楼主要按照审稿人的意见,逐条修改。提前恭喜啦。
4楼2012-07-12 11:09:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gordonlj

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
rainmanj: 金币+2, ★★★很有帮助 2012-07-12 17:29:56
看着编辑的意见,肯定的因素多。感觉希望还是挺大的。在修改时,可以找一些套话,放在里面,你找找,看有没有好的模板。其次,就是回复的时候,一定要详细和准确。
5楼2012-07-12 11:26:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见