24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yfglion

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 453.5
散金: 777
红花: 7
帖子: 211
在线: 236.2小时
虫号: 1506726
注册: 2011-11-23
专业: 信号理论与信号处理

[求助] 大家帮我看看《SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences 》的审稿意见吧

The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
1、论文介绍了一种***算法，有一定新意，论文研究成果有一定理论参考价值。
2、（9）式中应有一个角度为负值。

Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
The paper presents a source localization method ****. According to the idea,****. This is an available and beautiful work. The mathematical derivation is impressive. It should be an ideal work if the reason that the proposed method has improved resolution is analyzed.

Page1, Line34, “trade-off” is not a verb. The sentence should be “and it is indicated that***** trades off MSEs for lower computation complexity and an improved resolution…”.

Page1, Line56, The sentence “This is because*****.” should be reorganized.

Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
作者您好,

根据专家审稿意见,本文工作有一定新意和理论参考价值,适合在本刊发表.建议进一步分析阐述改善空间谱估计分辨率的机制,仔细进行写作改进和文字梳理,并及时反馈给编辑部.欢迎今后在获得重要创新成果的时候,选择投稿<中国科学:信息科学>.

我现在的疑问是专家和AE同时提到的关于“the reason that the proposed method has improved resolution is analyzed”的建议，这点分析起来难度较大，如果用数学公式证明的话。因为一般的分析分辨率的论文都可以单独写一篇，而且篇幅挺长。对于该问题我该怎么回复，通过仿真不知道可以不？

再就是根据上述意见，论文接收的可能性大小？？

多谢各位了

回复此楼