| 查看: 1769 | 回复: 22 | |||
| 本帖产生 1 个 ESEPI ，点击这里进行查看 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
winter_north铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
Where is the balance point between being low-carbon and the quality of life
|
||
At present, it is beneficial to llive a low-carbon life to the environment. Such as when washing, use less water, when going to a place, take a bus instead of driving a car, or you can go there by bike, or even go there on foot. However, as you live a low-carbon life, the quality of your life will be affected.  When you become more low-carbon, your life becomes less convenient. Take the transportation as an example. Going to a place on foot is nearly the most low-carbon way, but meanwhile it is the most unconvenient way. You have to walk in the natural air, it may be hot, cold or even humid. There may be many dirty particles in the air, you skin may also be bited by insects. Furthermore, much more time is needed compared with bicycling or driving. If you go there by bike, the time needed is much shorter. But you may still meet the unconvenience of rain, cold or hot air, and the insect. It is less low-carbon than walking, because more energy is needed to make a bicycle. If you go there by bus, you can stay in the bus with clean and comfortable air, it is also faster than bicycling and walking. But, the bus can not drive you to your destination, you have to walk. Compared with walking and bicycling, you need more energy, but compared with driving yourself, you need less energy. Driving yourself to the destination may be the most convenient way to go to your destination. It is the fastest, coziest way. You share the space of a car with yourself, you step in the car from the step of your house, and step out the car at the step of your destination house. However, this way is also the most un-low-carbon way of transportation, the gas of the car, the space of the car and the space it occupies on the road is only used by one person. And, much more engery is needed to make a car than a bicycle. Another interesting example may be bathing. Too often bathing consumes more water, but less bathing may make yourself stink.  So, where is the balance point?  This is a question. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件
已经有7人回复
-
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗
已经有8人回复
-
申请2026年博士
已经有6人回复
-
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有5人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有5人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有7人回复
-
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有6人回复
-
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了
已经有7人回复
-
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
Mary0505
木虫 (正式写手)
- ESEPI: 12
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4094.1
- 散金: 286
- 红花: 5
- 沙发: 25
- 帖子: 797
- 在线: 482.9小时
- 虫号: 339900
- 注册: 2007-04-07
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 有机化学
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
shuixian2009: 回帖置顶 2012-06-07 13:26:23
shuixian2009: 金币+5, That what we can do is to make our circumambient environment becoming beter and beter 2012-06-07 13:31:31
shuixian2009: 回帖置顶 2012-06-07 13:26:23
shuixian2009: 金币+5, That what we can do is to make our circumambient environment becoming beter and beter 2012-06-07 13:31:31
|
Yes, the low-carbon life and the comfortable life is very difficulte with the fast speed of the economy. Most of the countries are advocate to live in a low-carbon life. But for the countries the economy's development is necessary. TBut the economy's development will lead to the pollution of the circumstance without questions. This question is also very difficulty to solve for all the countries now. But for some developed countries, they have made some laws to restrict the very serious polluted companies to bulid on their domain. So many of the serious polluted companies transfered to the developing countries, because they did't have so many destrict for those companies. But now the world countries also make some pollution index to pass the buck to those developing countries. So the low-carbon life are infact on all over the world. But we also live in the same world, what I can do is do sth I can to make my circumambient environment becoming beter and beter later! |
18楼2012-06-07 12:15:21