| 查看: 9438 | 回复: 39 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
初审意见两个审稿人，一个强调创新性不强，一个要求大修. 该 怎样回复啊？ 谢谢
|
||
|
4月份投稿，一个月回来审稿意见，两个专家意见不一致： Reviewer #1: The authors have applied an adequate strategy and experimental setup for the characterization of the parameters involved. The work has adequate relevance with regard to the methodical approach applied. The experimental design presented here is simple, comprehensible and replicable. The advances of the article are very limited because the experimental approach and observations made as such are well known and adequately established. Therefore, the novelty aspects are diminished. The results show only a marginal advance in the concerned research field. Therefore, I regret that the manuscript is likely to have a low scientific impact. Reviewer #2: It is an interesting paper, although there are certain points that need improvement. ..... 编辑考虑:Based on the advice received, your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. 显然编辑比较好，请教各位虫友，这第一个专家的意见该怎样回复才能比较有说服力？修改好后还会送给第三个专家仲裁么？谢谢各位虫友。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有3人回复
-
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有12人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
-
AI论文写作工具：是科研加速器还是学术作弊器？
已经有3人回复
-
2026博士申请-功能高分子，水凝胶方向
已经有6人回复
-
论文投稿，期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
-
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
-
请问2026国家基金面上项目会启动申2停1吗
已经有5人回复
18楼2012-05-10 14:22:25
2楼2012-05-10 07:52:07
啸天犬
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 2171 (讲师)
- 金币: 12116.6
- 红花: 45
- 帖子: 3961
- 在线: 301.4小时
- 虫号: 1362468
- 注册: 2011-08-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 水文地质学(含地热地质学)
3楼2012-05-10 07:53:55
marshalsanetti
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3352.1
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 220
- 在线: 122.5小时
- 虫号: 225969
- 注册: 2006-03-23
- 专业: 质谱分析
4楼2012-05-10 08:15:06