| 查看: 3074 | 回复: 12 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
hhzjw金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
大修之后再大修，还有希望吗？ 已有6人参与
|
|||
|
一篇论文春节期间大修稿返回，二审结论还是大修，主要是审稿专家1好像还不满意，叫我缩减内容变成techanical note，继续修？审稿专家1再不满意，主编还给我修吗？这修到啥时候啊，我看大修后审了2个月，就估计有点不妙，大家给点意见，该怎么改？上次审稿专家都送我手稿审改稿的扫描件，这次又送了，悲催啊，关键我上次找过语言润色了，还有语法问题，这，过去润色过后都没提问题了啊，难道是对修改稿不满意找个托词？ 我该如何改呢？ --------------------- Dear Dr. ***: We have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "*****", which you submitted to ***. Based on the advice received, your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments. Your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript. ...... This paper would be of interest to the readers of ***. However, more efforts may as well be necessary. Limitations and assumptions should be clearly explained in your paper. Also, the English should be checked by a native speaker. Thank you. Reviewer #1: The proposed category of the paper is not suitable. I recommend category to be changed to Technical note. I think the technical content is interesting and will be useful to readers. However, many sentences are extremely difficult to comprehend or grammatically wrong. Moreover, some of the methods and results lack sufficient description. I am worried that it will take two or more reviews and revisions to make this manuscript become a paper. I recommend that the authors make the manuscript simple and short while clearly describe the limitations and assumptions that are used to obtain the results. Reviewer #2: The revised manuscript is a good improvement from the original submission. There are still a few typos and suggested improvements before it is ready for publication. I have annotated my suggestions in the returned manuscript. [ Last edited by hhzjw on 2012-4-24 at 22:46 ] |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 百宝箱 |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有15人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有9人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大修之后还会送原来的审稿人吗？
已经有12人回复
- sci 被拒后，大修改后重投这个杂志有戏吗？
已经有35人回复
- 大修后 编辑再提问后 decision in process 的问题
已经有9人回复
- 论文5个月后，收到大修通知，专家提了很多问题（60多个），还有接收的可能性吗？
已经有16人回复
- 有关大修后decision in process的问题
已经有16人回复
- 审稿人说大修，但是论文被拒，给编辑再发邮件申诉有用吗 7.19 更新
已经有30人回复
- 有没有两个审稿人一个拒，一个大修，然后编辑reject但是可以resubmit
已经有16人回复
- 悲剧，reviewer给大修，编辑给据了。。
已经有20人回复
- 大修之后还有两个审稿人认为语言不行，该怎么办呢
已经有13人回复
- 大家帮分析下这个是据稿、大修还是小修？希望大吗？（散50B，每人2个）
已经有68人回复
- 审稿回来，一个大修，一个接受，大家看还有希望吗？
已经有50人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
3楼2012-04-25 03:49:32
timegardener
银虫 (正式写手)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 91 (初中生)
- 金币: 1102.6
- 散金: 1000
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 457
- 在线: 168.4小时
- 虫号: 1452780
- 注册: 2011-10-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境微生物学
2楼2012-04-25 03:44:00
yanwuliaorao
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 1462 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.088
- 金币: 15622.2
- 散金: 1899
- 红花: 54
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 15373
- 在线: 1011.7小时
- 虫号: 1749011
- 注册: 2012-04-10
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
4楼2012-04-25 06:01:07
exon2002
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 82 (初中生)
- 金币: 11588.5
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 2217
- 在线: 929.6小时
- 虫号: 170490
- 注册: 2006-01-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 细胞信号转导
5楼2012-04-25 08:30:48
