| 查看: 1985 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lishihuihao金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
投稿退修已4个月了，应不应该撤，请求高人指点！
|
||
|
我于去年12 月投稿，今年1月编辑回信如下： Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable toaccept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. I am particularly concerned about the issues of clarity and novelty, which may be connected: perhaps the novelty of your work was just not explained well enough for the reviewers to understand. If further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript. Your revision is due within 6 months. 根据审稿人的建议修改后，前几天重新提交，今天又收到如下来信： Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. I understand from my preliminary reading that you addressed some of the reviewer comments on the earlier version of this manuscript. However, before I can send the manuscript out for review I must ask you to revise it to address two points that our policies now require of all contributions in this topical area. First, I must ask you, again, to report the conversion data as reaction rates, normalized by the number of ostensible catalytic sites (i.e., as turnover rates). Preferably, the kinetics results would be captured as rate equations in which the Arrhenius parameters (normalized pre-exponential factor, apparent activation energy) could be compared with those expected from the likely rate determining step and with those obtained in other laboratories. Second, especially because you have studied catalysts with varying pore dimensions, I must ask you to present evidence that the reaction rates have not been influenced by the rates of internal mass transport. A Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test would suffice. Those tests will require that you prepare samples in which the loading of the metal is varied, at constant metal dispersion, and then demonstrating that the normalized rate of reaction does not change with metal loading. You will understand that we are striving to archive results that can be readily compared across laboratories and that bear on the underlying molecular phenomena. In addition, I can suggest that the reviewers and readers would be interested in knowing whether the catalysts behave the same when exposed to the same concentrations of methane, carbon dioxide and products when the temperature of the catalyst is controlled externally. I am formally rejecting this manuscript to give you the opportunity to make those changes. If you continue to consider that Energy & Fuels can provide your work with an attentive audience, then, when further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address those concerns in full, we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript as a new submission. Please refer to the Manuscript ID above and include a detailed list of the changes you make when you submit the new manuscript so we can process it rapidly. 第一次退修，只有审稿人的修改意见，编辑并没有提出他自己的建议。第二次退修，编辑让补充动力学实验，否则不给送审。我提交的是关于催化剂表征及助剂对反应活性影响比较方面的内容，审稿人也没有提动力学，对编辑的要求我该怎么办？补动力学实验很费时间， 结果也不一定理想，我是不是该撤稿另投？迷茫中，我已耽误了4个月，再重投还有多大希望，再被拒的话，时间就白白晃过去了 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求助！投稿有没有这种情况的，求指点！
已经有11人回复
- nature communications投稿，请高人指点。
已经有15人回复
- OL稿件退修相关问题请教求助！
已经有6人回复
- 请指点：optik投稿方法
已经有6人回复
- 《电网技术》期刊退修问题
已经有15人回复
- 第二次修改应该怎么标记？
已经有8人回复
- 第一次投稿，中文核心CSSCI，退修，流程是在编辑部，但含审稿专家意见，请问有戏吗
已经有12人回复
- 一个月之前投了一个杂志，编辑部说重复率高文章不能用，现在网上投稿系统显示退修
已经有9人回复
- 期刊给了作者稿件退修时间四个月，正常吗
已经有9人回复
- 请问论文退修(修改后录用)，第一第二作者还可以调换下顺序不呢？
已经有10人回复
- 稀有金属材料与工程 投4个月了 复审是什么状态？
已经有14人回复
- 稿件退修，什么情况？
已经有8人回复
- 第一次投稿，文章被退修，专家给了意见，大家帮忙看看，还有希望吗？
已经有76人回复
- 意见是退修再审，还有一些外审给的意见不明白，第一次投稿，望大虫们指点！
已经有5人回复
- 关于稿件退修这样的情况，不做修改可以吗？
已经有5人回复
- 第一次投稿，初审就被退修～～还有木有希望啊！
已经有41人回复
- 退修时发现实验数据有问题怎么办？
已经有9人回复
- 怎么申请延长退修期限
已经有6人回复
- 《化学研究与应用》退修后稿件状态是什么样子的？
已经有20人回复
- 【求助】Koros-Nowak or Madon-Boudart test
已经有6人回复
- 投稿过程中有一项是comment，这个东东到底写什么？请高手指点！
已经有4人回复
- 中国科学F退修还是撤稿？
已经有12人回复
- 今天收到通信学报的稿件退修通知，请前辈指点
已经有21人回复
- 请高人指点论文投稿，紧急！！
已经有24人回复
- 很有趣：当Reviewer变成文章的合作者时，如何回复他的审稿意见？请高人指点，谢谢！
已经有35人回复
leimiao_hit
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
小元
- SEPI: 7
- 应助: 1336 (讲师)
- 贵宾: 0.707
- 金币: 113738
- 散金: 12354
- 红花: 385
- 沙发: 888
- 帖子: 85000
- 在线: 6307.5小时
- 虫号: 1264338
- 注册: 2011-04-13
- 专业: 蔬菜学与瓜果学
5楼2012-04-06 00:26:11
seapass
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
超哥
- SEPI: 18
- 应助: 772 (博后)
- 贵宾: 3.074
- 金币: 16568.4
- 散金: 5496
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 3728
- 在线: 930.8小时
- 虫号: 441856
- 注册: 2007-10-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋环境科学
2楼2012-04-05 22:07:55
sally208
专家顾问 (著名写手)
-
专家经验: +19 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 443 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 0.809
- 金币: 7058.4
- 散金: 6125
- 红花: 123
- 帖子: 2290
- 在线: 412.2小时
- 虫号: 514807
- 注册: 2008-02-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 光谱分析
- 管辖: 微米和纳米
3楼2012-04-05 23:05:16
hq_angel
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 460 (硕士)
- 金币: 12992.5
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 4136
- 在线: 301.4小时
- 虫号: 1645061
- 注册: 2012-02-26
- 专业: 公共管理
4楼2012-04-05 23:39:36
