24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3441  |  回复: 30
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ajxa1546

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 麻烦各位大侠帮我看下编辑是啥意思,一审已经结束了,是不是被拒了呀

小硕第一次写sci,英文本来就不好,老板要sci论文才能毕业,上月投了一个,今天给回复了。麻烦各位大侠帮我看下编辑是啥意思,一审已经结束了,是不是被拒了呀

Dear Dr ,

Thank you for sending your paper for our consideration.  We have now had an opportunity to review it and I am sorry to inform you that we are unable to proceed further with it for the reasons given below.  Please understand that we have to take hard decisions as we receive more papers than we can publish.   

With kind regards.

Yours sincerely

Colin Ratledge
Editor - Biotechnology Letters

P.S.  If you use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have your paper written to a higher standard, we would be prepared to consider a new paper from you on this topic.  Please also ensure that your revised paper conforms to the advice given in our Instructions to Authors and Guidance Notes (downloadable from our website).  

COMMENTS

x    Overall presentation unsatisfactory;

REVIEWER COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer #1: BILE3838

The mechanism of apoptosis induced by flavokawain B has been studied with many cell lines. In this manuscript, An J. et al presented their result with lung cancer cell (H460) and found the partially different mechanism to that one published by the same group (Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2011).  Overall, the experiment was designed extensively and reasonably. The result is interesting but there are some concerns I really hope authors could address them well:

Major:
1.        The language was poorly organized. The authors are therefore urged to use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have their paper written to the required standard.
2.        Some data were confusingly presented, especially figure 2B and 2C. The figures are conflicted with legends.

Minor:
1.        The full name of FKB should be mentioned at the very beginning of this paper (title and abstract).
2.        For figure 1, why there was increase of cell viability with low dose of FKB?
3.        For figure 2B, the result of western blotting should be mentioned clearly that it is the cyt C in cytosol. The result of mitochondrial cyt C should also be done and presented together.
4.        For figure 2C, it should be pCDNA3.1, not "pDNA3.1". and it need to be described well how authors cloned the construct with survivin.
5.        For figure 3A, authors should give the information of Bik antibody. Authors did not mention any information of this antibody. I don't think they can get such good signal with anti-Bik antibodies from Cell Signaling.
Since the change of Bcl-xL is one of main points of their result, authors should re-do this experiment. With antibody from Cell Signaling, it should be two bands. And it does exist in cell with two isoforms.
In the legend of figure 3a, it should be Bcl-2 family, not "Bcl family".
6.        In the second part of result. Since both XIAP and Survivin were decreased dramatically after treatment, why author select survivin only to do the study further.


The English and grammar is unacceptable in the manuscript and requires a major re-write. The figures are poorly presented and make reviewing the data difficult. There is little novelty or this is not clear from the results compared to previous studies from the same group.

The Editorial Manager is at: http://bile.edmgr.com/

[ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-4-15 at 15:47 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zznjut

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

万里独行之江湖散人

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
悲剧了
楼主换杂志吧。。。。。。。。
禾口言皆土也王求
9楼2012-04-05 12:45:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 31 个回答

seapass

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

超哥

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
文章的构架、语言表达是大问题,先修改好了,重新投吧
独上高楼。。。
2楼2012-04-05 09:54:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hls85915

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

科研工具版——沙漠之胡

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
已经悲剧了,出版社像楼主这样的文章太多
哈哈
3楼2012-04-05 10:04:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ajxa1546

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by hls85915 at 2012-04-05 10:04:24:
已经悲剧了,出版社像楼主这样的文章太多

是被拒了吗?
4楼2012-04-05 10:35:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 7K1CJE38xLG4 2026-08-25 4/200 2026-08-26 02:04 by cNXvBfCpiZOM
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +17 木水思豆 2026-08-25 20/1000 2026-08-26 01:26 by chengyan1220
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +18 angus9576 2026-08-25 22/1100 2026-08-26 00:41 by merchancy
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 有没有大神帮我看看基金代码 28+4 1234567wang 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 19:15 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +17 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 22/1100 2026-08-25 15:36 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +5 process2012 2026-08-23 7/350 2026-08-25 09:42 by huixian257
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +17 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 18/900 2026-08-25 09:41 by windflowerwy
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +13 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 14/700 2026-08-25 09:10 by mrkang
[基金申请] 让我中一个面上吧! +13 大萍1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by 太傻了
[教师之家] 跳槽后在研项目怎么办? +5 简单化xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by 简单化xn
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +15 布布和一二 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-23 09:55 by 张春生
[基金申请] 时间戳今天,20号变了 +5 archvillain 2026-08-20 5/250 2026-08-22 06:12 by hui_daxiao
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
信息提示
请填处理意见