| 查看: 3462 | 回复: 30 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
ajxa1546铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
麻烦各位大侠帮我看下编辑是啥意思，一审已经结束了，是不是被拒了呀
|
|
|
小硕第一次写sci,英文本来就不好，老板要sci论文才能毕业，上月投了一个，今天给回复了。麻烦各位大侠帮我看下编辑是啥意思，一审已经结束了，是不是被拒了呀 Dear Dr , Thank you for sending your paper for our consideration. We have now had an opportunity to review it and I am sorry to inform you that we are unable to proceed further with it for the reasons given below. Please understand that we have to take hard decisions as we receive more papers than we can publish. With kind regards. Yours sincerely Colin Ratledge Editor - Biotechnology Letters P.S. If you use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have your paper written to a higher standard, we would be prepared to consider a new paper from you on this topic. Please also ensure that your revised paper conforms to the advice given in our Instructions to Authors and Guidance Notes (downloadable from our website). COMMENTS x Overall presentation unsatisfactory; REVIEWER COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: BILE3838 The mechanism of apoptosis induced by flavokawain B has been studied with many cell lines. In this manuscript, An J. et al presented their result with lung cancer cell (H460) and found the partially different mechanism to that one published by the same group (Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2011). Overall, the experiment was designed extensively and reasonably. The result is interesting but there are some concerns I really hope authors could address them well: Major: 1. The language was poorly organized. The authors are therefore urged to use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have their paper written to the required standard. 2. Some data were confusingly presented, especially figure 2B and 2C. The figures are conflicted with legends. Minor: 1. The full name of FKB should be mentioned at the very beginning of this paper (title and abstract). 2. For figure 1, why there was increase of cell viability with low dose of FKB? 3. For figure 2B, the result of western blotting should be mentioned clearly that it is the cyt C in cytosol. The result of mitochondrial cyt C should also be done and presented together. 4. For figure 2C, it should be pCDNA3.1, not "pDNA3.1". and it need to be described well how authors cloned the construct with survivin. 5. For figure 3A, authors should give the information of Bik antibody. Authors did not mention any information of this antibody. I don't think they can get such good signal with anti-Bik antibodies from Cell Signaling. Since the change of Bcl-xL is one of main points of their result, authors should re-do this experiment. With antibody from Cell Signaling, it should be two bands. And it does exist in cell with two isoforms. In the legend of figure 3a, it should be Bcl-2 family, not "Bcl family". 6. In the second part of result. Since both XIAP and Survivin were decreased dramatically after treatment, why author select survivin only to do the study further. The English and grammar is unacceptable in the manuscript and requires a major re-write. The figures are poorly presented and make reviewing the data difficult. There is little novelty or this is not clear from the results compared to previous studies from the same group. The Editorial Manager is at: http://bile.edmgr.com/ [ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-4-15 at 15:47 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 大侠们帮忙看看NMR 谢谢
已经有11人回复
- 请大家帮助一下，编辑给的 major revise and further review 是啥意思？
已经有24人回复
- 麻烦问下杂志对题目的这个要求是什么意思？
已经有3人回复
- 帮忙看看DOB是什么意思
已经有5人回复
- 请帮忙看下编辑是什么意思，非常感谢
已经有4人回复
- 论文被拒求大侠指点
已经有14人回复
- 求助编辑的一个意思
已经有4人回复
- 论文初审意见回来，但没有看懂是什么意思，请大家帮忙指点个下，谢谢！
已经有8人回复
- 英文不好，帮看看编辑是什么意思？
已经有4人回复
- 我是不是该与编辑联系一下
已经有3人回复
- 论文退回修改要求提供可编辑图片，求各位大侠赶紧指点啊。急急急----
已经有3人回复
- 审稿人你是什么意思？
已经有7人回复
- 投稿某论文后收到回复，各位大侠看看是什么情况？
已经有20人回复
- 一审 外审7天结束是什么意思
已经有26人回复
- 各位大侠，帮帮忙
已经有19人回复
- 大侠们，帮我看下以下的公式代表的是什么意思？？
已经有5人回复
- Submitted to Journal 已经一周了，请教各位大侠这是什么意思？
已经有10人回复
- 编辑的这封信什么意思，用不用我回复啊？？？
已经有13人回复
- 投了OL，修改后要求Optional Revisions，什么意思啊
已经有7人回复
- 请各位大侠帮忙看一下我的液相色谱图究竟怎么了？
已经有13人回复
- 大侠们帮我看看 editor invited 是啥意思啊
已经有17人回复
- JPCC 回复了 ，如下，让我选编辑，请大侠看看是什么意思？
已经有18人回复
5楼2012-04-05 10:36:28
seapass
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
超哥
- SEPI: 18
- 应助: 772 (博后)
- 贵宾: 3.074
- 金币: 16568.4
- 散金: 5496
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 10
- 帖子: 3728
- 在线: 930.8小时
- 虫号: 441856
- 注册: 2007-10-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 海洋环境科学
2楼2012-04-05 09:54:45
3楼2012-04-05 10:04:24
ajxa1546
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1318.8
- 散金: 2
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 126
- 在线: 224.1小时
- 虫号: 594871
- 注册: 2008-09-07
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 生殖医学工程
4楼2012-04-05 10:35:15
