24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3467  |  回复: 30
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ajxa1546

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 麻烦各位大侠帮我看下编辑是啥意思,一审已经结束了,是不是被拒了呀

小硕第一次写sci,英文本来就不好,老板要sci论文才能毕业,上月投了一个,今天给回复了。麻烦各位大侠帮我看下编辑是啥意思,一审已经结束了,是不是被拒了呀

Dear Dr ,

Thank you for sending your paper for our consideration.  We have now had an opportunity to review it and I am sorry to inform you that we are unable to proceed further with it for the reasons given below.  Please understand that we have to take hard decisions as we receive more papers than we can publish.   

With kind regards.

Yours sincerely

Colin Ratledge
Editor - Biotechnology Letters

P.S.  If you use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have your paper written to a higher standard, we would be prepared to consider a new paper from you on this topic.  Please also ensure that your revised paper conforms to the advice given in our Instructions to Authors and Guidance Notes (downloadable from our website).  

COMMENTS

x    Overall presentation unsatisfactory;

REVIEWER COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer #1: BILE3838

The mechanism of apoptosis induced by flavokawain B has been studied with many cell lines. In this manuscript, An J. et al presented their result with lung cancer cell (H460) and found the partially different mechanism to that one published by the same group (Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2011).  Overall, the experiment was designed extensively and reasonably. The result is interesting but there are some concerns I really hope authors could address them well:

Major:
1.        The language was poorly organized. The authors are therefore urged to use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have their paper written to the required standard.
2.        Some data were confusingly presented, especially figure 2B and 2C. The figures are conflicted with legends.

Minor:
1.        The full name of FKB should be mentioned at the very beginning of this paper (title and abstract).
2.        For figure 1, why there was increase of cell viability with low dose of FKB?
3.        For figure 2B, the result of western blotting should be mentioned clearly that it is the cyt C in cytosol. The result of mitochondrial cyt C should also be done and presented together.
4.        For figure 2C, it should be pCDNA3.1, not "pDNA3.1". and it need to be described well how authors cloned the construct with survivin.
5.        For figure 3A, authors should give the information of Bik antibody. Authors did not mention any information of this antibody. I don't think they can get such good signal with anti-Bik antibodies from Cell Signaling.
Since the change of Bcl-xL is one of main points of their result, authors should re-do this experiment. With antibody from Cell Signaling, it should be two bands. And it does exist in cell with two isoforms.
In the legend of figure 3a, it should be Bcl-2 family, not "Bcl family".
6.        In the second part of result. Since both XIAP and Survivin were decreased dramatically after treatment, why author select survivin only to do the study further.


The English and grammar is unacceptable in the manuscript and requires a major re-write. The figures are poorly presented and make reviewing the data difficult. There is little novelty or this is not clear from the results compared to previous studies from the same group.

The Editorial Manager is at: http://bile.edmgr.com/

[ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-4-15 at 15:47 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hls85915

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

科研工具版——沙漠之胡

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
已经悲剧了,出版社像楼主这样的文章太多
哈哈
3楼2012-04-05 10:04:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 31 个回答

seapass

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

超哥

优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
文章的构架、语言表达是大问题,先修改好了,重新投吧
独上高楼。。。
2楼2012-04-05 09:54:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ajxa1546

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by hls85915 at 2012-04-05 10:04:24:
已经悲剧了,出版社像楼主这样的文章太多

是被拒了吗?
4楼2012-04-05 10:35:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hls85915

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

科研工具版——沙漠之胡

优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by ajxa1546 at 2012-04-05 10:35:15:
是被拒了吗?

是的,是委婉的拒绝你的文章
哈哈
5楼2012-04-05 10:36:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +5 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-09-01 17:54 by 小伟大博士
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 4/200 2026-09-01 14:58 by jiaoxg
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +6 yuleib84 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-31 19:46 by 鱼翔浅底1
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
信息提示
请填处理意见