24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3691  |  回复: 127

zjxpku

铁虫 (小有名气)



annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
接受就好。。。其他的慢慢弄
101楼2012-04-04 17:27:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yellowduke

新虫 (正式写手)



annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 啸天犬 at 2012-04-04 10:51:25:
这是让你写一个6行左右的非技术性的摘要。你看看人家这个BETWEEN-THE-COVERS SECTION是什么?以前发表的文章有没有这个部分?我估计就是一个简介,相当于highlights吧,就是两点。

highlight
102楼2012-04-04 17:34:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ludyking

木虫 (著名写手)



annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝贺,
104楼2012-04-04 17:40:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

仰慕苍穹

木虫 (著名写手)



annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝贺 文章接受
107楼2012-04-04 18:42:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)



annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
本帖仅楼主可见
108楼2012-04-04 20:49:23
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

hx_zm

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


同意一楼
109楼2012-04-04 20:53:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaoghit

金虫 (正式写手)


照猫画虎就行
111楼2012-04-04 22:16:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

辣娇2013

新虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
恭喜楼主啦,希望我的文章也能被顺利接受。
116楼2012-04-05 09:21:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

thisflying

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
祝贺lz论文高中,这是要求你给他们提交一个6行左右的非技术性的摘要
117楼2012-04-05 09:30:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wtp0619004

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


祝贺祝贺
118楼2012-04-05 09:34:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ajxa1546

铜虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
P.S.  If you use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have your paper written to a higher standard, we would be prepared to consider a new paper from you on this topic.  Please also ensure that your revised paper conforms to the advice given in our Instructions to Authors and Guidance Notes (downloadable from our website).  

COMMENTS

x    Overall presentation unsatisfactory;

REVIEWER COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer #1: BILE3838
FKB induces NSCLC H460 cells apoptosis by adjusting ratio of Bax/Bcl-xl and activating JNK

The mechanism of apoptosis induced by flavokawain B has been studied with many cell lines. In this manuscript, An J. et al presented their result with lung cancer cell (H460) and found the partially different mechanism to that one published by the same group (Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2011).  Overall, the experiment was designed extensively and reasonably. The result is interesting but there are some concerns I really hope authors could address them well:

Major:
1.        The language was poorly organized. The authors are therefore urged to use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have their paper written to the required standard.
2.        Some data were confusingly presented, especially figure 2B and 2C. The figures are conflicted with legends.

Minor:
1.        The full name of FKB should be mentioned at the very beginning of this paper (title and abstract).
2.        For figure 1, why there was increase of cell viability with low dose of FKB?
3.        For figure 2B, the result of western blotting should be mentioned clearly that it is the cyt C in cytosol. The result of mitochondrial cyt C should also be done and presented together.
4.        For figure 2C, it should be pCDNA3.1, not "pDNA3.1". and it need to be described well how authors cloned the construct with survivin.
5.        For figure 3A, authors should give the information of Bik antibody. Authors did not mention any information of this antibody. I don't think they can get such good signal with anti-Bik antibodies from Cell Signaling.
Since the change of Bcl-xL is one of main points of their result, authors should re-do this experiment. With antibody from Cell Signaling, it should be two bands. And it does exist in cell with two isoforms.
In the legend of figure 3a, it should be Bcl-2 family, not "Bcl family".
6.        In the second part of result. Since both XIAP and Survivin were decreased dramatically after treatment, why author select survivin only to do the study further.
The English and grammar is unacceptable in the manuscript and requires a major re-write. The figures are poorly presented and make reviewing the data difficult. There is little novelty or this is not clear from the results compared to previous studies from the same group.



麻烦大家也帮我看下吧。小硕第一次写,是怎么回事呢?
119楼2012-04-05 09:35:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

可可西

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


恭喜恭喜,不知道楼主做什么方向,高兴之余,不妨分享下投稿经验,以便参考!
121楼2012-04-05 18:22:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paradiseyb

铜虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
应该就是写个简单的总结吧
123楼2012-04-06 10:36:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

冰室蓝轩

铜虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
恭喜lz。。祝福。。。我们什么时候才能发一篇呢
124楼2012-04-06 18:43:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

annafeifei

木虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
119楼: Originally posted by ajxa1546 at 2012-04-05 09:35:54:
P.S.  If you use the services of a professional paper writing agency to have your paper written to a higher standard, we would be prepared to consider a new paper from you on this topic.  Please al ...

建议你另开一贴求助吧,这样看到的人可能会多一些。
我个人理解就是你的英语表达还需要改进,他建议找公司好好改改,另外你似乎没有按要求的格式来哦。
125楼2012-04-06 19:20:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

njuptghost

木虫 (正式写手)


同意1楼的说法
127楼2012-04-20 23:54:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
longway102103楼
2012-04-04 17:39   回复  
annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
jlfu999105楼
2012-04-04 17:47   回复  
annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 祝福
yaoyao145106楼
2012-04-04 17:55   回复  
annafeifei(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
lhi861221110楼
2012-04-04 21:57   回复  
恭喜恭喜
bedirty112楼
2012-04-05 00:00   回复  
恭喜恭喜。。。。。。
jgwang113楼
2012-04-05 00:09   回复  
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
祝福!祝福!祝福!祝福!祝福!祝福!祝福!祝福!
wangsaigongz114楼
2012-04-05 08:28   回复  
恭喜恭喜
zhouzhenming115楼
2012-04-05 08:31   回复  
祝福
xdbuaa120楼
2012-04-05 16:48   回复  
恭喜恭喜
shiyouren122楼
2012-04-06 09:56   回复  
祝福!!
tory04126楼
2012-04-06 21:56   回复  
墨守丹青128楼
2012-04-21 10:11   回复  
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 annafeifei 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见