| 查看: 5143 | 回复: 43 | |||||
[交流]
关于提供投稿Acta帮助的提议
|
|||||
|
虽然我不大喜欢大家投稿ACTA 期刊,特别是Acta E. 但看起来还是有不少人因为毕业等,有这方面的需要。 因此,总是有不少人来问我有关ACTA投稿中的问题, 而我对其繁文缛节其实也不甚了了, 而且其他求助已经非常多,忙不过来了。 因此我提议, 投过ACTA E,有些经验的,能否进来回复一下,并具体说明能提供哪些帮助(投稿流程,格式,画图?) 这样后来者来问我时,我把他们的问题转给你们, 使得他们的问题能及时得到解决,不耽误其毕业。 谢谢。 [ Last edited by xi2004 on 2012-3-30 at 08:40 ] |
» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
初学晶体 | 晶体解析相关 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
MOF合成
已经有0人回复
请问各位大佬ACS投稿状态这样是成功了吗?
已经有6人回复
无机化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有58人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
怒了,Acta Mater 审稿意见
已经有23人回复
关于参考文献修改意见
已经有4人回复
投稿 Acta E,编辑给的修改意见,请各位大侠给解释下,在线等结果~
已经有8人回复
投稿时审稿人给的关于XPS的修改意见,不知道该怎么处理了,求办法…………
已经有3人回复
对于审稿人具体意见以外的修改如何处理?
已经有7人回复
关于文章修改意见
已经有6人回复
投acta,审稿人给了较正面的意见,但是编辑却给据了,苍天啦,大地啦
已经有19人回复
急问!!!第一次投稿,意见是小修,但是有一个关于修改的问题向大家请教
已经有38人回复
spectrochimic acta 投稿一周显示send back to author,却没有意见,是怎么回事?
已经有6人回复
菜鸟提问!投稿意见要求提供所有参考文献的首页到底是什么意思?
已经有13人回复
关于我校的期刊级别认定,请多给建议,多谢!
已经有35人回复
关于Chinese Physic B 初审意见,帮忙看看
已经有15人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
桂林理工大学材料科学与工程学院诚聘青年教师
+1/126
【MLPA-NGS 技术】Y 染色体微缺失 / SNP 分型 /mtDNA 检测试剂盒,现货直供!
+1/93
双面压敏硅胶胶带
+2/90
加拿大/英属哥伦比亚大学曹彦凯课题组招收全奖博士/博后 [机器学习/优化/控制方向]
+1/81
天津大学精密测试技术及仪器全国重点实验室柔性电子技术实验室专任副研究员招聘启事
+1/76
校长团队招博士生和博士后
+1/34
校长团队招博士生和博士后
+1/33
能够检测核磁、LCMS的机构或个人请跟我联系
+1/15
限广州,征女友
+2/8
意大利CSC机器人方向博士招生
+1/7
南京航空航天大学航天学院黄护林教授课题组博士研究生招生(工程热物理专业)
+1/6
上海大学长江学者钟云波教授团队招收外场冶金或材料加工方向2026年博士研究生
+1/5
CSC 因斯布鲁克大学计算机系 联培/攻博
+1/3
博士后招聘-液态金属与低温生物医学研究中心
+1/3
中山大学院士团队王来源教授课题组招聘博士后
+2/2
QS Top-88悉尼科技大学数据科学/AI 招收2026年入学 校奖 博士生2名,3月底截止
+1/2
上海中医药大学 谢老师课题组招收2026年申请考核博士生1名
+1/2
3 纯 4 自 7 己 0 写 9 非 ③ 中 1 介 ⑦ 优0 惠
+1/2
上海有机所—林欣蓉研究员(有机能源材料和固态电池方向)院士团队招聘博士后和科研助理
+1/2
浙江师范大学夏永姚/黄健航教授团队招收2026级博士
+1/1
7楼2012-03-29 10:23:16
2楼2012-03-29 09:29:41
3楼2012-03-29 09:36:36
6楼2012-03-29 10:12:18
9楼2012-03-29 11:05:14
10楼2012-03-29 11:06:59
11楼2012-03-29 12:55:40
19楼2012-03-29 16:12:54
20楼2012-03-29 17:18:52
22楼2012-03-29 21:29:22
23楼2012-03-29 22:02:01
★
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
The Guidelines for Co-editors can be found on the journal website at http://journals.iucr.org/e/services/coeditors/index.html; click "Notes for co-editors" and then "Detailed editorial guidelines"; I am also sending these Guidelines to you at the >bottom of this message. > > >In order to make visible the changes, which I ------------------------------------------- > >5. DETAILED EDITORIAL GUIDELINES > >The purpose of this section is to promote consistency in the treatment of >submitted structure reports, and to draw attention to the points that most >often need to be checked and amended. It is hoped that this will make the >task >of Co-editors easier, and will also encourage authors to avoid common errors >and problems. > >5.1. General text > >(1) Length of lines in CIF: unimportant except must be <80 characters; >be careful not to generate longer lines when editing! >(2) Avoid hyphenation of words across line breaks. >(3) Spaces are needed after punctuation (period, comma, semi-colon and >colon). >(4) No spaces before punctuation, after ([ and before )], and before \. >(5) Paragraphs in text separated by blank lines. >(6) Common errors: >/ instead of \ >A instead of \ >^o^ instead of \ for degrees symbol >Greek letters spelt out instead of coded, e.g. sigma for \s, eta for \h >Chemical formulae in text blocks without subscripts >(7) Spelling may be either British or American but must be consistent >throughout the paper. >(8) No comment lines beginning with # inside semi-colon delimited text >blocks; they are treated as normal text! > >5.2. Title, authors and abstract > >(1) Title should usually be compound name and/or some informative brief text >referring to the nature of the compound; long systematic names are >undesirable. >Additional text such as Redetermination of; a neutron study; at high >pressure; >a strained polycyclic molecule; The first example of, is welcomed, but >Crystal >structure of and similar phrases are unnecessary. Avoid titles consisting >only >of a chemical formula. First letter of title should be capital (except for >prefixes like ortho-, trans- or dl-); no capital letters for start of other >words. >(2) Compound name (not necessarily strict full IUPAC) and chemical formula >should be in Abstract if not in Title. >(3) Any crystallographic symmetry of molecules should be stated in Abstract. >(4) No crystal data (cell parameters, space group, etc.) in Abstract unless >good reason. >(5) Abstract must have some real information content. The title compound >has >been synthesised and its crystal structure determined is not an acceptable >Abstract! This is particularly important if there is no Comment section. >(6) Avoid specific atom numbers in Abstract, which should be comprehensible >without reference to the rest of the paper. If there is a Comment section, >references should be avoided in Abstract (but OK here if there is no >Comment). >(7) Only one paragraph is allowed in the Abstract. >(8) One full forename for each author is preferred. >(9) No _publ_section_synopsis section is needed. Remove any supplied. > >5.3. References > >(1) In text sections: check correct format. If more than two authors, use >form >(Author1 et al., 1998) - no comma after Author1 name. For two references in >same year for same authors, use 1998a, 1998b. For two authors, use & >between >names. >(2) Reference list: check correct format. Alphabetical order of first >author >name. Blank line after each reference. Inclusive page numbers >(first-last). >Check consistency with references in body of paper (same authors, same >years, >no references missing or extra in list). If there are problems, ask the >author >to supply missing/corrected items, or a complete new reference list if >several >changes are needed. >(3) Software: check all references present in body of CIF and in list, with >correct format. Addresses should be city and country, but not full address. >References required also for absorption, extinction, and absolute structure >procedures if used. >(4) References are not needed for scattering factors from International >Tables. > >5.4. Experimental > >(1) _publ_section_experimental should be not used; instead, two separate >sections _publ_section_exptl_prep and _publ_section_exptl_refinement should >be present. >(2) _publ_section_exptl_prep: either full synthesis details should be given >(quantities of reagents, reaction conditions, recrystallization procedure) >or a reference to the method published elsewhere (this is strongly >encouraged, >though not compulsory). Other characterisation data (chemical analysis, >spectroscopy, etc.) may be included. >(3) _chemical_compound_source should not be more than a few words; 'see >text' >is appropriate if details are in _publ_section_exptl_prep. >(4) _publ_section_exptl_refinement: routine structure solution and >refinement >procedures are not needed and should be omitted. Comment belongs here for >treatment of disorder, non-standard data collection or refinement, etc., >including use of constraints and restraints. Particularly useful if there >are >checkCIF alerts to be explained. >(5) No experimental details (except special cases) in Abstract or Comment >sections. > >5.5. Atom and geometry tables > >(1) Sensible atom names (including H atoms). >(2) No parentheses in atom names. Atom labelling needs to be consistent >in all tables, text sections, and Figures! >(3) Sensible order in lists of geometry. >(4) All geometry involving H atoms should preferably be included (but not >flagged for publication); this is required if H atoms have been refined >rather >than constrained, and in such cases, the range of bond lengths to H atoms >should be stated in _publ_section_exptl_refinement. >(5) Check consistency in number of atoms and chemical formula (checkCIF). >(6) Even though space restrictions are not important for electronic >publishing, >and full geometry is available to readers, sensible selection for the >html/pdf >versions should still be made. Avoid symmetry-equivalent items in the >selected >list. >(7) There should be no su's on H-bond geometry involving constrained H atoms >(D-H, H...A, and D-H...A). >(8) Coordinates of constrained H atoms should not have more decimal places >than >refined coordinates; similarly for geometry parameters. >(9) Numerical results quoted in text sections should usually have su's, >including torsion and dihedral angles. > >5.6. Number of decimal places > >Adjustment of number of decimal places is now done in the production of >the final publication so it is not necessary to make these changes in the >CIF. >The section editors will act as a final check during proof-reading. The >following adjustments are made: > > Formula mass: 2 (i.e. _chemical_formula_weight) > Calculated density: 3 (i.e. _exptl_crystal_density_diffrn) > Wavelength: 5 (i.e. _diffrn_radiation_wavelength) > Theta ranges (cell and data collection): 1 > (i.e. _cell_measurement_theta_min and > _cell_measurement_theta_max and > _diffrn_reflns_theta_max) > mu (in mm-1): 2 (i.e. _exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu) > Transmission coeffs: 3 (i.e. _exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min and > _exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max) > Crystal dimensions: 1 or 2 depending upon apparent precision > (i.e. _exptl_crystal_size_max, > _exptl_crystal_size_mid and > _exptl_crystal_size_min) > R values: 3 (i.e. all of _refine_ls_R_factor_obs > _refine_ls_R_factor_gt > _refine_ls_R_factor_all > _refine_ls_wR_factor_all > _refine_ls_wR_factor_obs > _refine_ls_wR_factor_gt > _refine_ls_wR_factor_ref > _diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents) > Goodness of fit: 2 (i.e. all of _refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_all > _refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_obs > _refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_gt > _refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref) > Intensity decay: not more than 1 > (i.e. _diffrn_standards_decay_) > Shift/su: 3 (i.e. _refine_ls_shift/su_max) > (If after rounding we get 0.000 put as < 0.001) > Electron density extremes: 2 > (i.e. _refine_diff_density_max and > _refine_diff_density_min) > Cell measurement temperature: not more than 1 > (i.e. cell_measurement_temperature) > > > > >5.7. Commonly needed changes > >(1) Space group symbols: use correct CIF-defined format, not SHELX style, >e.g. >P2(1)/c should be 'P 21/c' and Fdd2 should be 'F d d 2'. >(2) If no measured density, setting for method should be 'not measured' and >setting for value should be ? >(3) checkCIF may indicate rescaling of transmission factors; if absorption >corrections are not made, the transmission factors should be set as ? and >not >numerical values. >(4) Reflection observation threshold is often given as '>2sigma(I)' instead >of >'I>2\s(I)': note need for I before > and correct use of Greek symbol. >(5) Number of standard reflections and intensity decay are usually both zero >(0) for area detector data collections; these are often left as unset (?) by >authors. >(6) Treatment of H atoms in refinement: 'mixed' is default of >SHELXL-produced >CIF's regardless of actual treatment used, and is often incorrect: in many >cases it should be 'constr' instead. >(7) Weighting scheme formula: remove meaningless terms such as +0.00000P and >trailing zeros on all numbers. Ask author for an actual formula instead of >expressions like 'based on sigmas' or 'counting statistics'. >(8) With residual electron density peaks of significant size >(usually >1 e/A^3^), there should usually be a statement of their position, >given in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement text. >(9) Extinction coefficients <3sigma are insignificant and should not be >given. >(10) 'Absolute structure': remove any full literature reference from the >experimental table; it belongs in the reference list. Somewhere there >should >be a statement of how Friedel pairs have been treated and whether the >absolute >configuration of chiral molecules has been determined by this experiment, >assumed from the synthesis or other information, or is arbitrary for the >structure as reported. >(11) Watch out for cell parameters (and other values) with a final zero >digit >and an su of (10). Usually these zeros are spurious inventions of the >software >for generating the CIF. Ask the author for clarification, e.g. from the >original diffractometer output. >(12) Paragraphs in the text should be separated by blank lines. > >5.8. Graphics > >(1) Check the scheme (chemical formula diagram) for agreement with the >overall >formula. All entities should be present, including counter-ions and >solvent. >Avoid unnecessary detail, e.g. fully drawn phenyl groups instead of PPh~3~ >for a triphenylphosphine ligand. Charges should be given where appropriate. >(2) Although structural Figures are not compulsory, they should usually be >included. Ask at least for one Figure showing the molecular structure with >displacement ellipsoids and all unique non-H atoms labelled. It helps if >the >orientation is not completely different from that of the scheme. Figures >should be numbered, and referred to in the text sections. >(3) Check the figure captions. Percentage probability levels must be stated >for ellipsoids, and omission of any atoms (including H and minor disorder >components) noted. There must be a caption for each Figure. >(4) Atom labels and any other text should not intersect any atoms or bonds, >and >should be large enough to be clearly legible. >(5) Stereo figures are not particularly useful in an electronic publication, >as >they will not be a fixed size. >(6) Colour is welcomed, but it should have a purpose, e.g. distinguishing >different atom types; this is particularly useful for ellipsoid plots, where >there is little other available mechanism for making the distinction. > >5.9. Nomenclature >Chemical compounds should where possible be given their full name according >to >IUPAC rules. Although this is checked when possible by the editorial staff, >correct naming of a compound is the author's responsibility and ideally >should >also be checked by the Co-editor and referee(s) if used. Other points of >nomenclature should be as in Notes for Authors. The encouragement of the >correct use of bracket notation for planes, directions and forms is welcome. >Unusual abbreviations should be explained in full when first used. Authors >should be asked to supply notes on any nomenclature or usage which is not >common in scientific journals. > >5.10. checkCIF alerts >Level C alerts are not usually a problem. Some level B and all level A >alerts >need to be investigated. Authors should be encouraged, and in some cases >required, to provide information in the text sections (usually in >_publ_section_exptl_refinement) regarding these problems, even if they have >not >supplied VRF responses. *.* I also wanted to ask you and call you to possibly >correct once more your cif in this regard, that how is it possible that the >reported transmission values from your cif (Tmin/Tmax values) are fully >identical with the calculated ones? Experinece says that these never fully >agree to the 3rd decimal as it is your case. Look up in your files the values >calculated from your experiment, check them that they do not deviate more >than 10-15% from the calculated ones and replece them in your cif. >Subsequently try to upload this cif or send me in a mail. [ Last edited by brilliant on 2012-3-29 at 23:09 ] |
25楼2012-03-29 23:08:17
28楼2012-03-30 07:16:56
29楼2012-03-31 09:19:31
30楼2012-03-31 09:20:38
31楼2012-03-31 21:44:20
34楼2012-04-01 10:48:05
35楼2012-04-01 13:54:38
36楼2012-04-17 09:56:53
37楼2012-04-17 10:07:12
38楼2012-04-18 09:37:09
41楼2012-09-27 21:36:31
44楼2013-01-15 07:15:04
简单回复
2012-03-29 09:37
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
送鲜花一朵
送鲜花一朵
2012-03-29 09:49
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
jm0078楼
2012-03-29 10:39
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与

zhang731112楼
2012-03-29 13:19
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福
假大空13楼
2012-03-29 13:44
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与


hao52114楼
2012-03-29 13:44
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zhaoeager15楼
2012-03-29 13:57
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福祝福
28524653616楼
2012-03-29 13:58
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
hifishm17楼
2012-03-29 14:02
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ts_chenchao18楼
2012-03-29 14:17
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
liuyigeba21楼
2012-03-29 17:49
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
ts_chenchao24楼
2012-03-29 22:46
回复
yesyesno26楼
2012-03-30 00:17
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
11金刚27楼
2012-03-30 00:39
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
送鲜花一朵
送鲜花一朵
91088397432楼
2012-03-31 22:54
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与

江南的竹33楼
2012-03-31 23:42
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
yhtao39楼
2012-05-13 11:24
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
落花201140楼
2012-09-27 19:37
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与
fds32942楼
2013-01-13 09:07
回复
论泡妞43楼
2013-01-14 22:56
回复
xi2004(金币+1): 谢谢参与













回复此楼
