24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 11893  |  回复: 24
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

meonline

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] PNAS 修改后直接Pending Final Recommendation?已有12人参与

心里有些忐忑啊,在截止日期前两天提交的修改稿。Editor Board Member 是本领域的美国科学院院士,大牛。据我的有限了解,投到PNAS的文章修改后一般都会送二审吧。 忐忑中......

Stage                                        Start Date
Pending Final Recommendation 2012-03-27
Under Editor Review 2012-03-27
Under Editorial Board Review 2012-03-24
Author Approved Submission 2012-03-24
File Conversion Complete 2012-03-24


附一审意见:

Editorial Board Member's Remarks to Author:

Although two of the three referees are concerned about various aspects of this work, I think that it could be revised to deal with most of their concerns, and encourage authors to do so.


Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer #1:

Suitable Quality?: Yes
Sufficient General Interest?: Yes
Conclusions Justified?: Yes
Clearly Written?: Yes
Procedures Described?: Yes
... ...

Reviewer #2:

Suitable Quality?: No
Sufficient General Interest?: Yes
Conclusions Justified?: No
Clearly Written?: Yes
Procedures Described?: Yes
... ...

Reviewer #3:

Suitable Quality?: Yes
Sufficient General Interest?: Yes
Conclusions Justified?: No
Clearly Written?: Yes
Procedures Described?: Yes
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

路遥知马力
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ourlei

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
您好,我也投了个PNAS,让修改。下面是意见,这种情况,有啥主意事项么?
Reviewer #1:

Suitable Quality?:
Yes

Sufficient General Interest?:
No

Conclusions Justified?:
Yes

Clearly Written?:
No

Procedures Described?:
Yes

Comments:

Reviewer #2:

Suitable Quality?:
Yes

Sufficient General Interest?:
Yes

Conclusions Justified?:
Yes

Clearly Written?:
Yes

Procedures Described?:
Yes
20楼2013-06-19 19:56:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 meonline 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见