[交流] SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB

一共回来了三个意见 第一个人 The aim of this paper was to XX. The impact of this paper is average. While the paper is of some scientific interest, the experimental work is not clearly explained and the manuscript is very poorly written concerning grammar, sentence and paragraph structure, layout and formatting. There is no succinct establishment of the gaps in knowledge in past studies nor is there is a description of how this current study intends to fills those gaps. ````````I recommend the publication be rejected.没有说我的具体问题是什么，反正就是说不行 第二个人 让改一处检测仪器的参数 第三个人 提了七条不算苛刻的问题，逐条提问 请教有经验的虫子，这个问题严重吗？多长时间返回合适那，编辑给了两个月

回复此楼