24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4445  |  回复: 11

yfglion

金虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 投的IEEE SPL被拒了,1/2审稿人stronly suggest重投,是客套,还是真的该重投?

总共两个审稿人
第一个:
I believe the paper contains relevant results but it needs a great deal of revision work, which cannot be accommodated by an AQ decision. In signal processing letters, there is not the possibility of "major revision" and therefore I have no choice but to recommend rejection of the manuscript. However, I strongly suggest the authors to revise and re-submit the paper.
Detailed comments:
1) First of all, the clarity of the paper and the English usage need a significant improvement.
2) In Section I, the authors may want to cite a couple of papers, namely:
- Stoica, P.; Nehorai Arye; , "******," Acoustics, Speech and Signal .....
***
总共给了14条建议, 给的意见很详细,甚至连公式的小错误都看到了,很是感谢这个审稿人

第二个:感觉没仔细看我的论文,nnd
To the best of my knowledge, the proposed method is new. However, I think that the proposed method has major disadvantages compared to existing techniques, and I doubt that there are any significant advantages.

One disadvantage of the proposed method is that........
Moreover,.......
实际上,这个两个所谓的缺点都可以克服,而且我原文中明确分析了不存在该问题

[ Last edited by avast2009 on 2012-4-10 at 12:54 ]
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

IEEE~A+

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

强晓荦

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
普通回帖

astra

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1

yfglion

金虫 (小有名气)

astra

金虫 (正式写手)

tangbo5885

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

weijian1215

铜虫 (正式写手)

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1

yfglion

金虫 (小有名气)

相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yfglion 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见