24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2749  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

flydreamws

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 请教energy的审稿意见

大家好,我是第一次投稿energy,几个月前投的稿,现在审稿意见回来了,可是编辑的回复意思不是很明白,特向各位虫友请教,编辑的回复如下
“The review of your paper is now complete, and I attach the Reviewers' reports.  As you can see, the Reviewers present important points of criticism and a series of recommendations. We kindly ask you to consider all comments and revise the paper accordingly in order to respond fully and in detail to the Reviewers' recommendations. If this process is completed thoroughly, the paper will be acceptable for a second review.

In order to give our readers a sense of continuity, we encourage you to identify ENERGY publications of similar research in your papers. Please, do a literature check of the papers published in ENERGY in recent years and relate the content of relevant papers to the results and findings presented in your publication. Moreover, we have conducted a linguistic screening of your article. You can see the results under Editor's remarks below. In case no remarks appear, the language use in your paper has been accepted as it is.
。。。。。(此处为不重要内容,省略掉)
On your Main Menu page, you will find a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". Your submission record will be presented here.

The Editor may have uploaded comments for your attention. To access the comments, please click on 'Download Submission Files' and check for 'Manuscript with Editor's Annotations'. ”

我登陆审稿结果页面后,一直没找到'Download Submission Files'也没找到 'Manuscript with Editor's Annotations',怎么找到这个选项啊?另外,两审稿人共7个问题,两人问题比较相似,归纳起来第一类是introduction和conclusion表达应该更简明点,第二类是某张图中有两个标注不明显,第三类是对文中某个概念的疑问。请问虫友们,这些问题属于大改还是小改啊?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

华工老何

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by flydreamws at 2011-12-13 15:16:52:
投稿系统中的view decision写的是major revisions,这个按常规理解是大修的意思吗?可是审稿人提的问题好像没有涉及到太难回答的问题,可能最大的改动是introduction和conclusion需要more consise点。

请问你的重新投有结果嘛?我的也是the paper will be acceptable for a second review
我的文章是老板投的,我还不清楚是大修还是小修
三个审稿人,一个没嘛意见,一个直接接收,一个说我语言不行,要修改重投
8楼2012-02-13 15:44:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

sally208

专家顾问 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
flydreamws(金币+2): ★★★很有帮助 2012-02-27 20:54:13
第一个问题,注意看清楚最后一段话的第一句“The Editor MAY have uploaded comments for your attention”里面的“may”,没看到相关选项就说明你没有相关问题。
第二个问题,按你说的,应该是小改。、、

祝好运!
2楼2011-12-12 23:49:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kulapikaleio

金虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
flydreamws(金币+1): 有帮助 2012-02-27 20:54:24
energy投稿系统里面有标明是大修还是小修
the paper will be acceptable for a second review
听这句话 我觉得像是大修 至少还得送一次外审
3楼2011-12-13 09:42:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

flydreamws

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
: Originally posted by kulapikaleio at 2011-12-13 09:42:16:
energy投稿系统里面有标明是大修还是小修
the paper will be acceptable for a second review
听这句话 我觉得像是大修 至少还得送一次外审

投稿系统中的view decision写的是major revisions,这个按常规理解是大修的意思吗?可是审稿人提的问题好像没有涉及到太难回答的问题,可能最大的改动是introduction和conclusion需要more consise点。
4楼2011-12-13 15:16:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见