| 查看: 9004 | 回复: 18 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
小修后还要under review?要不要担心？
|
||||
|
一个多月前投了一篇文章到Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry杂志，审稿45天候一个评审人给大修，一个给了小修，最后编辑说决定小修后接受。昨天按照两个审稿人的意见修改了下投了，今天看状态又变成Under review了，难道小修后还要送审？求解惑!有点小紧张，投文章的时候都没有现在修回紧张！ Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. Comments: The authors have performed the work well and written the manuscript in a relatively clear manner. However, instead of showing figures and chromatograms for the identity and quantities of phenolics in the fermented products, these should be summarized in a table. Some recent references in cereals such as millet by Chandrasekara and co-workers should also be given as the type of phenolic acids present are similar. In the figure, either the two structures given should be modified to have B shown in the same way as A; that is the C3 moiety be on the top or to totally remove the figure as this is of minimum advantage. Some condensation of the text might be helpful as well. Additional Questions: Originality: Fair Technical Quality: Good Clarity of Presentation: Excellent Importance to Field: Fair Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions. Comments: The work is technically well done, with sufficient analysis of obtained subfractions in order to get a clear picture about antioxidant properties of investigated samples. Subject is interesting, and the study was well designed and performed. The manuscript is recommended for publication in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, with few minor comments: 1. On the Page 11, rows 239, 240 and 241 the sentences are vague and need to be reworded, so that the meaning of the text is clearly. Additional Questions: Originality: Good Technical Quality: Good Clarity of Presentation: Good Importance to Field: Poor |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 SCI写作、投稿、经验 |
» 猜你喜欢
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有3人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有5人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有3人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有3人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有5人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有7人回复
-
为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜？
已经有11人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有17人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 有没有投Letters in applied microbiology小修后还under review两个周没结果的
已经有10人回复
- 初审二审都是小修，二审提了三小问题，现提交一周under review.还给审稿人看吗
已经有16人回复
- 一审小修,投稿2月后稿件状态从require reviews completed到under review?
已经有13人回复
- 论文小修，under review一个月，正常否？
已经有20人回复
- 小修稿上传3个多月了，状态还是under review,催稿编辑也没反应，怎么办啊
已经有9人回复
- 文章小修，返修后一个半月还under review怎么写信给编辑？
已经有24人回复
- 大修小修后又under review
已经有19人回复
- 小修稿上传50天了还是under review，要不要催一下
已经有14人回复
- 大家小修后都under review 几回啊？
已经有15人回复
- 大修后under review第21天
已经有46人回复
- 小修后7个星期还在under review
已经有8人回复
- 小修还要under review，郁闷
已经有22人回复
- 期刊minor revise投稿后一直under review状态，求咨询信
已经有9人回复
9楼2011-12-02 20:13:30
2楼2011-12-02 18:49:34
3楼2011-12-02 18:52:10
4楼2011-12-02 18:53:02
